Answer: Official Ankara supports opposition forces fighting the tyranny of Bashar el Assad.
Explanation:
Ever since the start of the Syria revolution, Turkey has sided with opposition forces fighting President Bashar al-Assad's dictatorship. In the war in Syria, all the great powers of the world are involved, who, because of their different interests, support one of the warring parties. Turkey considers Assad a tyrant and therefore supports opposition structures that fight Assad's arbitrariness.
In addition to frequent clashes with the Syrian army, Turkey has repeatedly dealt with terrorists of the so-called Islamic State on the border. Especially after the breakdown of this barbaric quasi-state, Islamic State survivors are trying to escape from Syria, and frequent break-even attempts have been recorded at the Syrian-Turkish border. Turkey is also waging a real war on this border with the Kurds, especially the Syrians, who are Turkey's multinational enemies.
Answer:
B. Germany launched rapid attacks with advanced technology that
overwhelmed defending armies.
Explanation:
Specifically, <em>Nazi Germany used the strategy</em> now known as the Blitzkrieg, <em>which combined aerial as well as armored divisions to quickly overwhelm armies</em>. Many <em>European countries were expecting another World War I trench warfare</em>, and<em> had their war doctrine built around such a fight</em>. The Blitzkrieg, therefore, came as a surprise, and <em>allowed Germany to quickly overwhelm the enemies</em>. It also helped that they were allied with the USSR, and so after defeating Poland, they only had to deal with combined resistance from western Europe.
Learn more about Blitzkrieg, here:
brainly.com/question/15997495?referrer=searchResults - Defining blitzkrieg.
brainly.com/question/23308716?referrer=searchResults
African Americans in the North and South experienced discrimination. In the North, discrimination was less overt. In the South, it was very direct. Black Northerners could vote and enjoy some civil rights. In the South, civil rights and protections were nonexistent.
Answer:
Some Americans disagreed with Imperialism because constantly having the military caused stress and anxiety to the american people and it also felt very strict like the way it was in Britian, hence why we left them for our own freedoms. If you were sitting in school and the U.S. military was walking down the halls, that would cause stress because you would be thinking "oh is there something wrong?" If there were to be a king involved it would just be the same situation that the american people just left, and they wanted something different because that obviously didnt work well.
Explanation:
Imperialism: "a policy of extending a country's power and influence through diplomacy or military force"
"Imperialism is a policy or ideology of extending the rule over peoples and other countries, for extending political and economic access, power and control, through employing hard power especially military force, but also soft power"
"The anti-imperialists opposed the expansion because they believed imperialism violated the credo of republicanism, especially the need for “consent of the governed.” They did not oppose expansion on commercial, constitutional, religious, or humanitarian grounds; rather, they believed that the annexation and administration of third-world tropical areas would mean the abandonment of American ideals of self-government and isolation—ideals expressed in the U.S. Declaration of Independence, George Washington ‘s Farewell Address, and Abraham Lincoln ‘s Gettysburg Address. The Anti-Imperialist League represented an older generation and was rooted in an earlier era; they were defeated in terms of public opinion, the 1900 election, and the actions of Congress and the president because most younger Progressives who were just coming to power supported imperialism"
- American Imperialism | Boundless US History - Lumen Learning