Answer:
North Korea
Explanation:
North Korea is the country that has threatened world security in recent years because of its interest in becoming a nuclear power. Its leader wants to impose himself as a world figure and uses the threat of nuclear weapon as a bargaining chip.
<u>Venezuela : </u>The country is on the verge of a civil war, totally collapsed, not a threat to the world, but to its people yes.
<u>Vietnam:</u> No major conflict happening there now, and certainly not an emerging nuclear power.
<u>Iraq: </u>still recovering from wars... not a nuclear threat.
Untouchable, also called Dalit, officially Scheduled Caste, formerly Harijan, in traditional Indian society, the former name for any member of a wide range of low-caste Hindu groups and any person outside the caste system
Answer:
Following are the responses to the given points:
Explanation:
For point 1:
One of the key issues about Twitter's great executives is that only one lady on the board shows discrimination throughout the business. This means the company will keep contributing to the male dominant thoughts and ideas that dominate society. But on the other side Nextdoor strives for the removal or blocking of racial discrimination to build an equal voice for all. This means that people would not be profiled as well as stigmatized because they relate in society to the given religion or race. The two sites are very comparable, as well as the difference is that although Twitter is not equal, Nextdoor strives to create unity.
For point 2:
Karl Marx's conflict perspective means that people are in a constant struggle for limited resources, where social structure is maintained not by consensus but by dominance. It could mean that existing institutions, especially the majority races or powerful sexes, come to lead the minority as well as the powerless in society. But Nietzsche would recommend which society's citizens tend to what they appreciate as lengthy as it is morally He, therefore, supports the notion that because someone is potent or wealthy, you are not false as long as you seem to be morally acceptable.
The Constitution states that Justices "shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour." This means that the Justices hold office as long as they choose and can only be removed from office by impeachment.
