$3878.55
Explanation:
Step 1 :
It is given that Kristy has a biweekly gross earnings of $1950.
Since it is bi-weekly payments there are 26 payments in the year.
Gross earnings per year = 1950 * 26 = $50,700
Step 2 :
It is given that the social security tax is 6.2% up to $128,400. Kristy's earnings of 50,700$ does not exceed the threshold $128,400, hence 6.2% of her entire income is subject to social security withholding.
Social security withholding = 6.2% of 50,700 = 6.2*50700/100 = $3143.40
Step 3 :
It is given that Medicare tax is 1.45% with no wage limit
Medicare withholding = 1.45% of 50,700 = 1.45*50700/100 = $735.15
Total withholding = Social Security withholding + Medicare withholding 3143.40 + 735.15 = $3878.55
Answer:
A. Distracting billboards
Explanation:
Billboards are huge advertisements placed on the roadsides. They promote products or brands of different companies. They also advertise events and popular venues. Billboards are for commercial use and located in urban centers.
Billboards are paid for; hence, they will be placed where there are likely to communicate to a broad audience. In rural areas, billboards are not economically viable due to the sparse distribution of people. For this reason, billboards do not pose any risks to people driving in rural areas.
Unpaved, poorly maintained roads, Poorly lit roads at night, and Wildlife or livestock crossing roads are characteristics or rural setting. Anyone driving in the upcountry is highly likely to encounter them.
According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Answer:
$444,444.44
Explanation:
Larry's life insurance corporation is trying to sell an investment policy that will pay you and your heirs a total amount of $32,000 per year
The required return on this investment is 7.2%
= 7.2/100
= 0.072
Since the cash flow is a perpetuity then, the amount that will be paid for the policy can be calculated as follows
PV= C/r
= $32,000/0.072
= $444,444.44
Hence the amount of money that will be paid for the policy is $444,444.44
Because how do you know whether or not to accept the position. How do you know if it’s the right job for you? Or, what if you have to choose between two appealing offers? Will you feel comfortable with the people you work with?
