1. Rachel’s prejudice violates the requirements of critical thinking because she didn’t even try to get to know his character and how he is as a person. She has stated that “heavy people tend to be lazy and dishonest.” 2.) her prejudice violates the requirements of critical thinking due to having an opinion about him from the get go. Her views wouldn’t have changed if he was a good or a bad person because of having assumptions like “she would not hire an overweight person or trust one.”
The correct answer would be A. Negative eugenics is believing that people with "undesirable" traits shouldn't produce offspring
Each player will have 3 card and there will 2 game cards left over
Can you rephrase the question? :)
Answer:
In social psychology, attribution is the process of inferring the causes of events or behaviors. In real life, attribution is something we all do every day, usually without any awareness of the underlying processes and biases that lead to our inferences.
For example, over the course of a typical day, you probably make numerous attributions about your own behavior as well as that of the people around you.
When you get a poor grade on a quiz, you might blame the teacher for not adequately explaining the material, completely dismissing the fact that you didn't study. When a classmate gets a great grade on the same quiz, you might attribute his good performance to luck, neglecting the fact that he has excellent study habits.
