Answer: state ownership
Explanation:
State ownership was once considered the ideal engine for economic growth, but resulted in inflated public-sector bureaucracies and inefficient public companies.
In state owned enterprises, there are inefficiencies among the employees as they don't really strive to achieve their goals unlike those that works in private establishments who are more serious with their work.
Answer:
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
Explanation:
Given in this case, Maxwell is applying "Universal Commercial Code (UCC)" division 2 provision, which defines all the goods and services.
A movable property, which can be sold from seller to the buyer at certain prices are called goods. Therefore, in this case, "Raw Cream" comes in the definition of goods, as it is directly sold to Maxwell by the grocery shop.
Maxwell will win this case, as per division 2 of UCC, seller bears the cost for loss under implied warranty of fitness, if the goods do not meet the ordinary purpose or is inefficient.
Personal
The guy above me said so yeah