<span>false cause
When a speaker or writer tries to connect two things that don't directly have an effect on each other as having an effect on each other, it is false cause. Saying that one thing directly causes another when there is no proof or factual evidence to back that up weakens an argument significantly. </span>
To look back in time and remember something that already happened
Answer:
The question above is a moral one.
In order to achieve a balance, we must become aware that the Author and Consitution that measures morality puts everyone on the same level.
That is, if one person lies, they are no different morally from one who steals.
This realisation that there is 'right' and 'wrong' and that there is one that administers over everyone to check the latter, helps with conviction and checks one from being too quick to be others to judgement.
It's key to note that the good book makes it clear that a servant rises or falls before his Master and that with the same measure that one person judges another, shall he or she be judged.
Man at the best will always be imperfect. There are three stages of imperfection:
- Imperfect but getting worse
- Imperfect but just in-between
- Imperfect but getting better consistently
Cheers
