Answer:
b) neuroticism
Explanation:
Neuroticism: In psychology, the term neuroticism is one of the traits in the Big-Five personality traits. An individual experiencing neuroticism undergoes in the long-term propensity to be in an anxious or negative emotional state.
A person who scores high on neuroticism are considered to be as moody and experiences different feelings such as worry, anger, envy, depressed mood, frustration, loneliness, fear, jealousy, etc. An individual with neuroticism will decrease with age.
In the question above, the statement signifies the neuroticism personality trait.
Answer:
The answer is
→ <u><em>Phatic communication</em></u>
Explanation:
Phatic communication is a type of communication that lay out a disposition of amiability rather than to convey significant data or thoughts.
Therefore, <u><em>phatic communication</em></u> is your answer!
Hope this helped! :^)
<span>Two ways in which Latin American is involved in international affairs today are:
</span>1. Climate change emmission controls
2. Peacekeeping in the United Nations
With the exception of Mexico, all the larger Latin American economies are involved in UN peacekeeping operations. Mexico was not involved because its constitution did not permit the military to go out of the country until recently. Once the constitution changed, Mexico is now starting to participate in peacekeeping missions, starting with Haiti.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. The argument presupposes the conclusion for which it purports to provide evidence.
Explanation:
The idea in this question is to identify the most vulnerable argument, for which it is possible to conclude that The first argument is only base in the opinion of the theorists and critics and there is no clear evidence or facts to prove the statement. It only states because of someone's opinion “no aesthetic evaluation of a work of art is sound if it is based even in part on data about the cultural background of the artist” simply the argument is false. This results as a fallacy since it is an argument without evidence to show that it is valid.
Answer:
South America's predominant democratic regimes and its increasing interdependence on regional trade have not precluded the emergence of militarized crises between Colombia and Venezuela or the revival of boundary claims between Chile and Peru. This way, how can we characterize a zone that, in spite of its flourishing democracy and dense economic ties, remain involved in territorial disputes for whose resolution the use of force has not yet been discarded? This article contends that existing classifications of zones of peace are not adequate to explain this unusual coexistence. Thus, its main purpose is to develop a new analytical category of regional peace for assessing this phenomenon: the hybrid peace. It aims to research the evolution of security systems in South America during the previous century and build a new, threefold classification of peace zones: negative peace zones, hybrid peace zones, and positive peace zones.
Explanation:
mark me brainliest
