Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The false consensus effect is a cognitive bias in which people assume that their ideas, opinions or beliefs are shared by the majority of others. This mentality relies heavily on the social environment, and is especially prevalent in groups, in which the members rarely have a dispute and thus suppose everyone else must think the same as them.
Answer:
in Japanese history, the political revolution in 1868 that brought about the final demise of the Tokugawa shogunate (military government)—thus ending the Edo (Tokugawa) period (1603–1867)—and, at least nominally, returned control of the country to direct imperial rule under Mutsuhito (the emperor Meiji). In a wider context, however, the Meiji Restoration of 1868 came to be identified with the subsequent era of major political, economic, and social change—the Meiji period (1868–1912)—that brought about the modernization and Westernization of the country
Explanation:
Answer:
Globalization affects you and me by giving people broader access to products and services, decreasing subsidies and tariffs, creating new opportunities for financial markets, giving national industries more access to international markets, and connecting national economies.
Explanation:
Give me brainliest!
The study of respondent behavior is to Pavlov as the study of operant behavior is to Skinner. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is behavior?
The term behavior refers to how a person react to a particular situation. A person behavior reflect the personality and show person attitude. The behavior change means a person change in attitude as well as developed new things are built.
The concept of the conditioned reflex was created through Ivan Pavlov's investigations on response behavior. The theory of how learning is a result of change in overt behavior was created by Burrhus and Frederic Skinner.
As a result, the respondent behavior is the study of Pavlov, operant behavior of Skinner. Therefore, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on behavior, here:
brainly.com/question/8871012
#SPJ4
Your question is incomplete, but most probably the full question was.
a) Pavlov; Skinner
b) Thorndike; Pavlov
c) Thorndike; Skinner
d) Skinner; Thorndike
Answer:
The Supreme Court case known as Kelo v. City of New London was controversial because it allowed greater use of the power of eminent domain.
Explanation:
Kelo v. City of New London is a judgment of the US Supreme Court on whether the government can expropriating private property and transferring it to another private entity, with the purpose of economic development of the city. The plaintiff, Kelo, was the resident of the requisitioned land, and the defendant was the municipality of New London, Connecticut. On June 23, 2005, the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court on this case attracted wide attention. This case involved a “paid collection” of land. According to the latest judgment of the US Supreme Court, local municipalities have the power to impose private land for commercial development – as long as such development falls within the category of “public use”. The Supreme Court ruled that “the city’s planned deployment of land acquisition is in line with 'public use' and within the meaning of the Fifth Amendment clause.” Therefore, the case also triggered a new round of discussions on how to implement the Fifth Amendment, how to explain it, and how to use it.