Answer:
Those who examine the impact of the Holocaust on politics deal with the extent, depth, type, and dynamics of the impact but not with the impact itself. The impact itself is considered axiomatic because it is so sweeping and vast. Since the issue is so large and made up of so many overt and covert associations - direct and indirect, Jewish and pan-human, immediate and belated, ethical and practical - a general framework that presents and diagnoses the matter becomes, by nature, a telegraphic prologue to innumerable studies already carried out and yet to come.
Explanation:
<span>Christians who were not the type of Christian majority in their cities were allowed to worship as they wished. Each prince could choose their denomination.</span>
I think:
1. Clergy
2. Nobility
3. Commoners
You could say that it is laws regarding slavery. One of his basic laws way back in 1066 was that no man shall sell another men, or they would pay a fine. This basically outlawed slavery in Britain. However, they enslaved Africans because they didn't consider Africans to be men later when exploration of Africa began.
