1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
4vir4ik [10]
3 years ago
9

Assume that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In this case, determine what is true with

respect to (a) price, (b) output, and (c) profits.
1. PMonopoly > PCompetition
2. PMonopoly < PCompetition
3. PMonopoly = PCompetition
4. QMonopoly > QCompetition
5. QMonopoly < QCompetition
6. QMonopoly = QCompetition
7. ProfitMonopoly > ProfitCompetition
8. ProfitMonopoly < ProfitCompetition
9. ProfitMonopoly = ProfitCompetition

a. Which of the combinations above are accurate?

b. Assume that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated

c. Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because

d. The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because

e. If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can
Business
1 answer:
grandymaker [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

a. 1, 5 and 7

b. Resources will be allocated inefficiently

c. Differing sizes and capacities

d. Benefits due to economies of scale

e. Reduce prices and improve resource allocation.

Explanation:

The correct combination is 1, 5 and 7. The price of a pure monopoly firm is much higher than that of purely competitive firm because the later is a price taker while the former is a price fixer. Because of this, output of monopoly is lower while the profit margin is higher than that of competitive firm.

Assuming that a pure monopolist and a purely competitive firm have the same unit costs. In the case of a pure monopolist, resources will be allocated inefficiently because the monopolist does not produce at the point of minimum Average Total Cost and does not equate price and Marginal cost.

Even though both monopolists and competitive firms follow the MC = MR rule in maximizing profits, there are differences in the economic outcomes because pure competitors lack capacity and are smaller in size while the monopolist has the capacity to expand inorder to maximize profits.

The costs of a purely competitive firm and a monopoly may be different because the monopolist is capable of taking advantage of cost reduction arising from economics of scale. Pure competitors does not experience economies of scale due to their small sizes.

If a monopoly can experience economies of scale, it can reduce prices beyond that of the pure competitor thereby ensuring a more efficient resource allocation.

You might be interested in
Consider the all-units quantity discount schedule below. Quantity Ordered Price Per Unit EOQ at that Price 1-499 $300 952 500-99
UkoKoshka [18]

Answer: B. 1023, 1500, 2000}

Explanation:

The Optimal solution should contain the set of quantities that would require the lowest no. of orders to achieve a discount in a class.

1,023 is quite close to the lowest amount required of 1,000 in the 1,000 to 1,499 range.

So are 1,500 and 2,000.

Option D can also work but it has too many order quantities and will inflate the price.

The Optimal Solution therefore has to be from this option.

5 0
3 years ago
A bond with 15 detachable warrants has just been offered for sale at $1,000.00 . The bond matures in 25 years and pays a semi-an
ad-work [718]

Answer:

$15.64

Explanation:

first we must determine the market value of the bond without the warrants:

PV of face value = $1,000 / (1 + 3.5%)⁵⁰ = $179.05

PV of coupon payments = $25 x 23.45562 (PV annuity factor, 3.5%, 50 periods) = $586.39

market value = $765.44

the market value of the 15 warrants = $1,000 - $765.44 = $234.56

market value per warrant = $234.56 / 15 = $15.64

6 0
3 years ago
Kouba Corporation is working on its direct labor budget for the next two months. Each unit of output requires 0.52 direct labor-
Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

Kouba Corporation

Direct labor budget for April and May:

                                                         April           May

Production in units                         1,700          1,600

Direct labor-hours per unit             0.52           0.52

Total direct labor-hours needed     884             832

Total direct labor-hours paid          960             960

Direct labor rate                           $9.00          $9.00

Total direct labor cost                $8,640        $8,640

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

                                                          April           May

Production in units                         1,700          1,600

Direct labor-hours per unit             0.52           0.52

Total direct labor-hours needed     884             832

Total direct labor-hours paid          960             960

Direct labor rate                           $9.00          $9.00

Total direct labor cost                $8,640        $8,640

Idle hours paid for                              76              128

Cost for idle hours                        $684          $1,152

b) The Kouba Corporation pays its workers for a total of 204 idle hours with a total cost of $1,836 for the two months period.  This amount is substantial, about 10% of the total amount paid for the two months.

6 0
3 years ago
Petrus Framing's cost formula for its supplies cost is $1,860 per month plus $11 per frame. For the month of March, the company
MissTica

Answer:

$355 unfavorable

Explanation:

Budgeted supplies cost was [$1,860 + (635 frames x $ 11)] = ($1,860 + $6,985) = $8,845

Actual supplies cost was $9,200, so the variance was = budgeted cost - actual cost = $8,845 - $9,200 = $355 unfavorable

Since the actual supplies cost was higher than the budgeted supplies cost, then the variance must be unfavorable (because more money was spent than expected).

4 0
3 years ago
Bonner Corp.'s sales last year were $415,000, and its year-end total assets were $355,000. The average firm in the industry has
koban [17]

Answer:

$182,083

Explanation:

The computation of the total assets by considering the total assets turnover is shown below:

Total assets turnover = Sales ÷ total assets

2.4 = $415,000  ÷ total assets

So, the total assets equal to

= $415,000 ÷ 2.4

= $172,917

So, the assets is reduced by

= Year-end total assets - calculated assets

= $355,000 - $172,917

= $182,083

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Companies may wish to implement a(n) ________ to achieve more growth, to realize higher margins, or simply to position themselve
    5·1 answer
  • Budgeted variable overhead for the year is $150,000. Expected activity is 30,000 standard direct labor hours. The actual hours w
    7·1 answer
  • Productive resources are _____.
    12·2 answers
  • Andrew, an employee in a corporate company, is asked to conduct a systematic evaluation of how well the company is meeting its e
    7·1 answer
  • Explain why monopoly is uncommon in the real world
    6·1 answer
  • Use the following selected financial information for Wilcox Corporation to answer questions 11-20. Wilcox Corporation Income Sta
    12·1 answer
  • The financial statements of the Bramble Corp. report net sales of $473850 and accounts receivable of $56000 and $25000 at the be
    12·1 answer
  • 4. When the actual price of a good is above its equilibrium market price, competition
    10·1 answer
  • An investment project has annual cash inflows of $4,200, $5,100, $6,300, and $5,500, and a discount rate of 15 percent. a. What
    8·1 answer
  • Once the information is complete and conclusions are made, then management can make more confident business decisions. This is p
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!