Your question has been heard loud and clear.
No , I would have fought for the bill of rights to be added after ratification because put simply , before ratification , you do not have a medium to pass the bill of rights , so logically fighting for bill of rights is only if the ratification does not include it , so when it does not include it , we fight for the bill of rights , I agree with this argument of lack of bill of rights as it is most certainly , fundamental to the constitution , and without it , freedom is a minor right which is often neglected. So definetly if bill of rights is not included in the constitution , ratification is not needed.
Thank you.
I believe the answer is: <span>pragmatics
violation of </span><span>pragmatics refers to a form of sentence that still lack coherent level of theorization.
This is very common to happen among children prior to 8-12 years old since they still haven't develop the cognitive ability to be able to fully differentiate the specifics that exist between one object to another.</span>
Answer:
Wild animals, domestic animals, and trespassing animals.
Explanation:
Strict liability tend to be imposed if other people's right are infringed because of those animals.
Example of this would be when wild animals are attacking other people in neighborhood, when domestic animals are spreading their feces without being picked up by the owners , or when the animals are trespassing and destroys the property owned by other people.
The correct answer is known as "<span>male erectile disorder."
Male Erectile Disorder or better known as Erectile Dysfunction, it is the inability of a male individual to maintain or attain an erect penis during sexual intercourse with his partner. Erectile Dysfunction is a common problem in men, many male individuals has experienced ED and it may be affiliated with stress or health problems that needs to be treated right away.</span>
