Available Options Are:
a. Cost of Goods Sold
b. Net Profit Margin
c. None of these
d. Asset Turnover
Answer:
Option B. Net Profit Margin
Explanation:
The increase or decrease in cost of Goods sold can not tell whether the return on assets has increased or decreased becuase it would only tell that the expense are decreased or increased not the profit. Which means it only tells one side of the story hence Option A is incorrect.
Option B is correct because it talks about the profit. If the manufacturing cost has been decreased then the it must increase the profit. Because if the profits has increased then the return on asset will increase. Hence the Option B is correct here.
Option D is incorrect because asset turnover formula is:
Asset Turnover = Sales / Total Assets
The decrease in manufacturing cost will not increase the sales because sales and total assets are independent of manufacturing expenses hence the Option D is incorrect.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Predetermined overhead rate is estimated at the start of the period by dividing the estimated manufacturing overhead cost by an allocation base. Predetermined overhead rate is quite useful especially in eliminating seasonal effects. So, the above statement is a true one important reason to apply the predetermined overhead rate is to mitigate the effects of seasonal factors.
Cost of machine = $1,000

=

= $1,492.11

)=

= $75.13
Total NPV = -1000+1492.11+75.13 = $567.24 ≈ $567
Answer:
The insurer shall be held liable
Explanation:
For any published or displayed content which relates to the insurer or it's products, the insurer shall be made liable for any inappropriate content.
In cases wherein the advertisement function has been assigned to an insurance agency, even in such a scenarios, the sole responsibility rests with the insurer and it's their primary responsibility to check upon the content advertised.
Thus, if any inappropriate content or misleading claims are made, it shall be assumed those have been issued by consent of the insurer and the insurer cannot escape this liability.
Answer:
First of all, an auditor must be skeptical about the information that he/she is gathering and analyzing. They should try to get as much audit evidence as they can in order to form an opinion. But an auditor can also reasonably assure that there are no material misstatements, either intentional or not intentional.
Most auditor procedures are intended to discover unintentional misstatements, but intentional misstatements are very hard to discover because more than one individual (or even a very large group) might have colluded in order to conceal them. The auditor gets his information from the controller, internal auditor, and other people within the organization, but what if they all colluded in order to conceal their bad actions.
E.g. an auditor should check for shipping receipts to be complete, accurate and in order, but he/she relies on information given by the same people that he/she is evaluating. The auditor can conclude that the shipping reports are complete, but he/she cannot state that they are true and valid because he/she wasn't there.