Answer:
The answer is "400 meals at 2.50 dollars a day".
Explanation:
Please find the complete question and the solution in the attachment file.
In this question, when we compare the MR value as well as the MC, the monopolist produces up to the point where MR>MC.
In this, it happens before 400 meals at 2.50 per day and, so "400 meal at 2.50 dollars a day".
Answer:
Hey mate.....
Explanation:
This is ur answer.....
<em>Universal policy premiums include two components: the cost of insurance amount and the savings component amount, also known as the cash value. The cost of insurance (COI) is the minimum amount you must pay to keep your policy active. This amount varies based on your age, health, and insured risk amount.</em>
Hope it helps!
mark me as the brainliest.....
Follow me! :)
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
Answer:
b. that they agreed to purchase.
Explanation:
A minor is a person who is under the age of 18 and unable to make decision on his own such as mentally impaired or incompetent persons .
A minor cannot enter a contract like adults but if under any circumstance they enter into a contract of sale purchase of daily goods like clothing etc, they are liable to pay the price which they agreed to pay.
Their parents are liable only if the contract was made according to the parent's will etc.
If the minor is unable to pay the agreed amount then the minor should return the goods or fulfill any other liability as imposed by the court of law.
