this is an opinion, so i really don’t think what others respond should have an effect on your personal answer. however, no, i don’t think the costs of ww2 were worth the casualties and financial loss because since it grew gradually, there was a generous amount of time to negotiate beforehand. however, i’m sure a lot of people disagree with this. see what other have to say.
increased jobs and lower prices
Clinton signed the North American Free Trade Agreement in 1994 to remove the barriers to trade with Mexico and Canada with the goal of creating new American jobs and lower prices on imported goods.
During the late 1970's and through the 1980's the US began to de-industrialize. This means factories began to shut down as companies were established in developing countries. Americans were experiencing job loss and prices on goods now produced in other countries were expensive due to tariffs. By signing NAFTA, Clinton removed tariffs from goods imported from Canada and Mexico making many manufactured goods and foods cheaper. The agreement also created more jobs in new industries to support the imports coming in. Customer service based jobs became available which were better paying jobs than the factory jobs they were replacing.
"Idealistic" is the one among the following choices given in the question that best <span>describes both Bismarck and Cavour. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B". I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your help.</span>
D
They were not allowed to eat and work
