Answer: The rate at which he is willing to substitute one good for the other
Explanation: Indifference curve shows the combination of two goods that give the consumer the same level of satisfaction. the slope of this indifference curve shows how much the consumer is willing to substitute one good for the other in order to keep utility constant.
Slope of Indifference curve for soda and chips shows how much soda Timothy is willing to substitute to get 1 additional unit of chips.
So, the correct option is the rate at which he is willing to substitute one good for the other.
The elements that would have to be in place for a contract to be unconscionable would be that
- They were under pressure
- They were misled
- They did not have the right information
<h3>What is meant by a contract?</h3>
This is the term that is used to refer to the fact that two people or more have agreed to do business with themselves.
In order to be a contract, one person would have to create a bargain and the other would be the one that would agree to the terms.
It is unconscionable at the time when the contract is done and the person or one of the parties is found not to have been able to make the contract agreement at their right frame of mind. In this case, the law has the power to protect this party.
Hence they would have to rule in his favor. Therefore to be unconscionable, a contract would have to have been misled, have been made under duress and without the adequate information.
Read more on contracts here:
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ1
Answer:
$1
Explanation:
The marginal cost refers to the cost of producing one additional unit or serving one more customer.
In this case, we have to determine the additional cost of Jacob ordering a burrito instead of a taco. As Mason chose the tacos and they agreed to split the lunch bill evenly, if Jacob decides to eat the tacos, the cost for each of them is:
$3+$3=$6/2= $3
If Jacob decides to eat the burrito:
$3+$5= $8/2= $4
So, the marginal cost to Jacob ordering a burrito is:
$4-$3= $1
