Answer:
X=97.24
Explanation:
PV = Present Value = X+2000 by the 16th years
PMT = Payments = $100
FV = Future Value = 2000 at the end of 16 years
n= number of years
Applying the equation of future value for annuity
FV = pmt* ((1+r)ⁿ - 1
)/r
Inputting the values;
2000=100*((1+r)¹⁶-1)/r
Solving for r, gives r = 2.9%
Therefore using the formula for PV for annuity;
PV=PMT*(1-(1/1+r)/r)
X=100*(1-(1/1.029)/0.029
X=100*((1-0.9718)/0.029)
X=100*(0.0282/0.029)
X=97.24
Answer:
Quantitative
Explanation:
The reason is that a good research report includes qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative research is non numerical data and it give information which helps in meaning making whereas the quantitative research is a research in which the researcher tries to find the numerical relation using quantifiable data, which is investigated through number of means which includes use of mathematics, principles, etc techniques to extract data. So the qualitative research is done here and the only thing the company requires is quantitative data.
Answer:
The gross profit margin of Candy Company is 65% (second option)
Explanation:
The gross profit margin is defined as:
Mg = (sales - costs) / price of sales
If for Candy Company the cost are $112,000 and sales $320,000 then the gross profit margin is:
Mg = ($320,000- $112,000) * 100% / $320,000 =
Mg = $208,000 * 100% / $320,000 = 0.65 * 100%
Mg = 0.65 * 100%
Mg = 65%
Answer:
The answer would be PRICE SIGNALING
Explanation:
Price signaling may occur when consumers have imperfect information about product quality. To infer quality, consumers may rely on previous experience or may use some of the product’s observable characteristics, such as the product’s price. We examine the scenario whereby the firm can endogenously change consumers’ beliefs about the product’s quality by altering both the price and quality of its product. Our main findings are that, in this type of setting, price signaling causes the firm to raise its price, lower its quality, and dampen the degree to which it responds to cost shocks. If the cost of adjusting quality is sufficiently high, the dampening effect is pronounced in the downward direction, meaning that price signaling causes prices to respond less to cost decreases than cost increases.
This shorter payback period is positive and beneficial to the consumer, as it allows for harmony with amortization expenses.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- A short payback period is beneficial because of its relationship to amortization, as long-term debt allows this amortization to take place.
- These amortization expenses allow the cost of long-term assets to be represented in the payment.
- However, when the short-term payback period allows for amortization, causing the asset's value to be reduced by the amount that will be paid by the consumer.
In this case, we can state that in cases like the one shown in the question above, the short payback period is very beneficial and interesting to the consumer, as it can promote economic benefits.
More information:
brainly.com/question/23160357?referrer=searchResults
