Answer:
being in short supply of something
Answer:
Lowell Corporation
The amount that will be recorded as goodwill by Lowell Corporation to record its investment in Boston is:
= $5,000.
Explanation:
a) Data and Calculations:
Investment in Boston Company = $83,000
Fair value of assets = $98,000
Fair value of liabilities 23,000
Net value of assets = $75,000
Goodwill = $5,000 ($80,000 - $75,000)
b) Acquired Goodwill is the difference between the cost of purchasing Boston Company ($80,000) and the net identifiable assets of Boston Company ($75,000). The net identifiable assets are calculated by subtracting the fair value of the liabilities from the fair value of the assets.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation of the MIRR is shown below:
But before that terminal cash flow required to calculate
<u>
Year Cash Flows FV Factor Formula Terminal Value
</u>
<u> (Cash Flow × FV Factor) </u>
0 ($1,000)
1 $450 1.21 (1 +10%)^(2) $545
2 $450 1.1 (1 + 10%)^(1) $495
3 $450 1 1 $450
Terminal Cash Flow $1,490
now the MIRR is
![MIRR = \sqrt[n]{\frac{terminal\ cash\ flow}{initial\ investment} } - 1\\\\= \sqrt[3]{\frac{\$1,490}{\$1,000} } - 1](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=MIRR%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%5Bn%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7Bterminal%5C%20cash%5C%20flow%7D%7Binitial%5C%20investment%7D%20%7D%20-%201%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B%5Cfrac%7B%5C%241%2C490%7D%7B%5C%241%2C000%7D%20%7D%20-%201)
= 14.22%
As it can be seen that the MIRR is more than the WACC so the project should be accepted.
Answer:
$200,000
Explanation:
Here, in the solution the tax effects are ignored as tax rate is not provided.
Since accrual basis is the acceptable basis, we have:
All the revenues and expenses are to be recognised in the period it belongs to, and not when the actual cash payment is received or made.
Total revenue earned in 2015 = $400,000
Total expense (Wages of employees) for 2015 = $200,000
Therefore, net income for 2015 = $400,000 - $200,000 = $200,000
Note: It is of no relevance that when actual cash was realised from debtors and when actual payment was made to employees.
Answer: A. Stability and change
Explanation:
The innovation paradox implies that consistency in products and services provokes a tension with the need for new products. This results in a conflict between
A) stability and change.
B) structure and culture.
C) rewards and metrics.
D) stability and metrics
The paralysis that occurs between sticking to existing products and services (stability) and the need for the development of new ones (change) is a direct effect of the innovation paradox which states that the more a firm pays attention to innovation, the less likely it will be to be successful at innovation. In other words, consistency in products and services provokes a tension with the need for new products. While stability enables change in that it supplies security and consistency, reserved knowledge and skills and enables commitment and the provision of resources for a better realization and actualization of change, change enables a firm to set up a new state of stability through variable mechanisms (innovation) This serves to assist an organization in reaching new stable stages with higher efficiency.
