1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zepelin [54]
4 years ago
8

Determine the type of property involved for each example.

Law
1 answer:
Liula [17]4 years ago
5 0

Answer:

he might not for get because tecnacly people were going to look for ward to it.

I might be wrong, Just in Idea.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Abdel fields vs United States explained
ioda

Answer:

gigigigiggiigiggigigigigiggggg

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which phrase best completes the diagram ( brown v. Board of education) ( Hernandez v. Texas) HELP
fgiga [73]
I believe the answer should be D.
The equal protection law was made so everyone would be treated equally and prohibits discrimination based on race, gender, religion, etc.
pls vote brainliest :)
8 0
3 years ago
Which of these arguments might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws?.
julsineya [31]

The argument that might be used by someone who supports strict campaign finance laws is that Corporations and labor unions that have too much power.

Financial law is defined as the law and standard or regulation of the derivatives, insurance, commercial banking, investment management sectors, and capital markets.

The people that support the strict campaign finance laws are the companies or corporations and the labor unions because they have a too much power in the finance laws.

learn more about the finance laws here

brainly.com/question/515053

#SPJ4

7 0
1 year ago
A state owned a large natural gas field and took bids for its exploitation. The highest bid came from an interstate pipeline com
cestrela7 [59]

Answer: b. No, because the state acted as a market participant

Explanation:

The state in this instance was a market participant because they were acting as buyers who were looking for companies that could supply the service of exploiting their gas fields.

As a result, they have total discretion to pick whichever supplier they choose, regardless of the benefits or lack thereof, much like a normal buyer would do. The interstate company would therefore lose the case.

4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is a TRUE statement?
Karolina [17]

Answer:

c. Both of the above are TRUE.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Johnson<br> And<br> Baseball<br> Torture<br> From<br> Wikipedia<br> the<br> Free<br> Encyclopedia!
    9·1 answer
  • You are the legal advisor of a big advertising company, Clooney Ideas. They have a lot of clients and every month you get variou
    6·1 answer
  • The Power to interpret the law belongs to the Supreme Court and lower courts
    7·1 answer
  • According to the text, the establishment of the American Law Institute (ALI) was a result of
    15·1 answer
  • Why do ppl hate me when i feel like im nothing in life im just asking a mf question
    11·1 answer
  • I've been trying to learn more about different laws for the United states. And I've been trying to learn the laws for each state
    12·1 answer
  • Under what circumstances might it be legally justifiable to search students before allowing them entry into a school sports even
    8·1 answer
  • Who was the US Bill of Rights designed to protect?
    12·1 answer
  • The removal of a statute of ______ led to protests in charlottesville.
    12·2 answers
  • What is the Purpose, Intent and Principles in Privacy policy?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!