Since this is an opinion question you can take it either way.
Pros:
- lower speed may cause lower speed accidents, which are less deadly than their high speed alternatives
- lower speed could potentially allow people to get lost less often because they are able to navigate and respond earlier
<span>- gas savings from optimal operating conditions (between 88.5 - 96.5 km/h [55-60 mph])</span>
Cons:
- longer commute times
- less enjoyable (if you enjoy driving fast)
- may contribute to overall congestion and increase in accidents as people spend more time on average on the roads
Either way, support our opinion and you'll be right.
<span>Three points of view from which a writer can be considered: he may be considered as a storyteller, as a teacher, and as an enchanter. </span>
Answer:
maybe because it looks nicer
but not every school teaches that mate
Explanation:
it could be either. it depends on how you want to interpret it. going strictly by the grammar (because of the Can), it would be interrogative. but going by the intended meaning, it could be seen as imperative (a nicely worded order). are you looking at syntax or semantics?
Answer:
Nutritional Adequacy.
Economic Considerations.
Food Service.
Equipment and Work Space.
Leftover Food.
Food Habits.
Availability.
Meal Frequency and Pattern.
Explanation:
There are more for reference
