Answer:
King James
Explanation:
<u>King James sponsored the first printed translation of the Bible</u> in English, this is why this version is called "King James". Before this, the Bible was only available in latin, and people didn't have access to it.
The printing press was one of the major technological changes of this era, and it made books available for everybody.
Answer:
thx for the points? umm hehe
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
The fundamental purpose of the theocracy in Salem was to ensure that individuals are bound to a strict moral code of conduct in both personal and political terms. ... At the same time, the theocratic rule allowed individuals with religious backgrounds, such as Parris, to assume unprecedented levels of power.
Read "What makes good people do bad things?", by MELISSA DITTMANN
Which statement best supports Zimbardo’s belief that people are not born “good” or “evil”?
A
. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
B
. “In one condition, they overheard an assistant calling the other students ‘animals’ and in another condition, ‘nice.’” ( Paragraph 8)
C
. “The same social psychological processes… that acted in the Stanford Prison Experiment were at play at Abu Ghraib, Zimbardo argued.” ( Paragraph 16)
D
. “As such, the Abu Ghraib soldiers' mental state… may have further contributed to their ‘evil’ actions, he noted.” ( Paragraph 18)
Answer: A
. “‘Any of us can move across it... I argue that we all have the capacity for love and evil — to be Mother Theresa, to be Hitler or Saddam Hussein.’” ( Paragraph 3)
Explanation:
Zimbardo claims that the line between good and evil is permeable, meaning that people are not born “good” or “evil”. On the contrary, everyone can cross that line, especially under certain circumstances. For example, the soldiers´ mental state and the lack of supervision, training, or accountability led to the abuse of an Iraqi prisoner in Abu Ghraib.
Answer:
It depends on the context but I think it is a metaphor
Explanation:
