Answer:
Prosecutors of this case can use the net worth method to determine the extent these executives have been receiving illegal incomes by computing their wealth at the beginning and at the end of the period under investigation.
There will be an increase in the executives wealth, and since this increase cannot be traced to any legal income source, it will become taxable income, with the calculated penalties and fines.
Explanation:
The net worth method specifies that any increase in wealth, which is not traced to non-taxable sources, should be determined as a taxable income for the period under review. Ordinarily, the net worth is the difference between assets and liabilities. Since the executives use the money personally at their convenience, this will increase their personal wealth.
Answer:
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $171.89 per direct labor hour
Explanation:
<u>To calculate the predetermined manufacturing overhead rate we need to use the following formula:</u>
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= total estimated overhead costs for the period/ total amount of allocation base
Total direct labor hours= (500*0.4) + (1,000*0.2)= 400 direct labor hours
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= 68,756 / 400
Predetermined manufacturing overhead rate= $171.89 per direct labor hour
Answer:
$105,547
Explanation:
Original cost of machine = $270,000
Machine sold for = $150,000
Book value = $120,000
Down payment = $30,000
$60,000 payable on December 31 each of the next two years
.
Present value of an ordinary annuity of 1 at 9% for 2 years = 1.75911
The amount of the notes receivable net of the unamortized discount:
= Amount paid on December 31st × Present value of an ordinary annuity
= $60,000 × 1.75911
= $105,547
Answer:
The Home owner commenced the action in a state A court ( C )
Explanation:
The Defendant ( the contractor) can decide to transfer the case from a state court to a federal court within the same state in which the case was filled by the The home owner if the federal court has the Jurisdiction to rule on the case
Since the contract was signed in state A under the laws of the state the case is definitely a state case and the Homeowner's move to remand the case to a state court with the argument that the Federal court lacks proper Jurisdiction is in order. The court decision on the matter will be based on the fact that the Homeowner commenced the action in a state A court where the contract was signed.
The statement that applies are the rental of ant kayak equipment you need the wages that you forgo by going kayaking and the fee for accessing the river in a national park
Explanation:
The true cost for going to a particular place includes all that costs that are included from moving to a place that includes all the wages and the vehicle cost
Here the opportunity costs includes the fee to go to the national park by crossing the river and the amount that is needed to be spent on the equipment and the wages that must be forgo by going to kayaking all these statements best includes the true costs of going to kayaking
