Answer:
The answer is B.
Step-by-step explanation:
4 is a multiple of 2, which explains the reasoning of answer choice B.
Answer choice A is wrong because 2 is Not a multiple of 4.
Answer choices C and D are incorrect because it takes multiple steps to solve for x and substitute into the other equation. They claim that it takes on step to solve for x, but it would take 2 steps to solve for x.
#teamtrees #WAP (Water And Plant)
Answer:
The answer to your question is: 161x + 17y - 391 = 0
Step-by-step explanation:
Data
y-intercept = 23 Get the points (0, 23)
x- intercept = 4.75 (4.75, 0)
4.75 = 17/4 (17/4, 0)
slope
m = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)
m = (0 - 23) / (17/4 - 0)
m = -23 / 17/4
m = - 161 / 17
equation
(y - y1) = m (x - x1)
( y - 23) = -161 / 17 (x - 0)
y - 23 = -161/17 x
17(y - 23) = -161x
17y - 391 = -161x
161x + 17y - 391 = 0
Answer:
79 because it cannot take two of the same number multiplied in order to get that answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
2/4 and 4/8 are equivalent because you can use the butterfly method of multiplication. Meaning you multiply the numerator by the other fractions denominator and vis-versa.
Step-by-step explanation:
2 x 8 = 16
4 x 4 = 16
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1/8 = 1/9 + x ...multiply by LCD of 72
9 = 8 + 72x
9 - 8 = 72x
1 = 72x
1/72 = x
1/8 = 1/10 + x....multiply by 40
5 = 4 + 40x
5 - 4 = 40x
1 = 40x
1/40 = x
1/8 = 1/11 + x....multiply by 88
11 = 8 + 88x
11 - 8 = 88x
3 = 88x
3/88 = x
can all unit fractions be made in more then 1 way like this ?
not to sure because that last one....because it has been that a unit fraction is the outcome of adding together 2 unit fractions...but that last one...3/88 is not a unit fraction