I strongly believe the answer is C. Because they both became the richest and most powerful country.
Evidence that can be used to modify or refute what Stannard said about Columbus would be (D) examples of long-term benefits for people in Europe and Asia that resulted from the voyages by Columbus.
<h3>What did Stannard think of Columbus?</h3>
David Stannard thinks very lowly of Christopher Columbus as a result of the latter's crimes in North America which included the killing and mutilating of Native Americans.
David Stannard believed that the exploration of the Americas brought only long-term pain to Native Americans so a view that would refute this would have to show descriptions that Native Americans enjoyed some long term benefits thanks to Columbus.
Find out more on Christopher Columbus at brainly.com/question/15581111
#SPJ1
Off thousand people and more
At firs Johnson sent advisers and gave weapons to the South
Vietnamese so that they fight the North Vietnamese. Later on U.S. bombers bombed parts of North
Vietnam and ground troops were committed to assist the South. More and more troops were being sent until
the U.S. became deeply involved in the conflict. When public support decreased, the U.S. began
its withdrawal from South Vietnam.
Answer:
He embraced the humanistic belief in an individual's capacity for self-improvement and the fundamental role of education in raising human beings above the level of brute animals. The thrust of Erasmus' educational programme was the promotion of docta pietas, learned piety, or what he termed the “philosophy of Christ”.
