Answer:
The United States committed itself to containing communism between 1945 and 1960 because this represented a pragmatic middle course between ignoring Soviet influence in the world and fighting it directly. This was the policy best adapted to US strategic, economic, and ideological interests after the Second World War.
I'm pretty sure it's D) :)
Explanation:
Answer:
* The conception of the separation of powers has been applied to the United Kingdom and the idea of its executive (UK government, Scottish Government, Welsh Government and Northern Ireland Leader), judicial (Britain and Ribs, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and legislative (UK Parliament, Scottish Parliament, Public Get together for Ridges and Northern Ireland Gathering) capacities.
* Truly, the obvious consolidation of the executive and the legislature, with an powerful Prime minister drawn from the biggest party in parliament and typically with a protected safe majority, driven scholars to battle that the separation of power isn't relevant to the United Kingdom. Be that as it may, as of late it appears to have been received as a vital piece of the UK constitution.
Explanation:
The United Kingdom is ruled by a constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy. The head of state is the monarch (currently Queen Elizabeth II) while the head of government is the Prime Minister (presently David Cameron, the head of the Conservative Party).
In contrast to the US, the UK has an unwritten constitution. Instead of being founded on a particular document, the constitution depends on legislation and precedent, just as European Union laws.
A political viewpoint that favors native inhabitants over immigrants is the best description of a Nativist.
Option 1
<h3><u>Explanation:</u></h3>
A nativist by definition is a person or a public viewpoint that favors the provision of better privileges and rights to native residents and inhabitants of an area as opposed to immigrants who merely shifter to the area. A nativist is not a politician related to and favoring only Roman Catholics to office as it relates to all natives and not just Roman Catholics.
A Nativist isn’t necessarily cruel but every cruel leader isn’t a Nativist. A Native American activist is also a decent description but a native activist need not support natives exclusively, just because he is native, making option 1 the best answer.
under Muslim control and ruled by Shari'ah, are considered Dar al Harb - enemy lands. Muslims, not submitted to Islamic Law in Muslim lands are considered “enemy ... Muslims, and the requirement for the establishment of the Caliphate. b. Fight and slay the unbelievers wherever ye find them, and lie in wait for them.
