What was the difference between African and European attitudes toward slaves

2 answers:

8 0

Well, since obviously Africa was affected by slavery in most likely the worst ways possible. Slavery, was a trade market for the wealthy whites' back in the late 18th century. Africans' we're the slaves themselves so they did not agree much to anything to do with slavery. Europeans' used slavery as a trade market( as i said up there ^). The Europeans' captured the Africans' and sold them for a wealthy gain. Now when america go involved they downed the pricess of slaves so the lower class whites' could afford slaves. Above all after slavery was abolished Europeans' are still hated by Africans.

I hope this helps!

kirill [66]3 years ago

3 0

The African slaves were treated way more rudely and they didn't care about them at all.

You might be interested in

What do you think has traditionally been the most important thing in Chinese culture?

tensa zangetsu [6.8K]

Answer:

Family

Explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

please hurry ! The Ottoman Empire formed a capitulation with King Francis I of France creating the Franco-Ottoman Alliance. As a

Viefleur [7K]

Answer:

b) The Franco-Ottoman Alliance had to face the enemies of the Hapsburg Empire.

Note:

I hope I've helped

UwU

3 0

3 years ago

What, in general, was the relationship between parliament and kings charles ii and james ii?.

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

The monarchs were mindful of Parliament's limitations on their authority. At the cost of Parliament, the monarchs were able to expand their authority.

Explanation:

Hope this helps you!!!!!! :D

3 0

2 years ago

What was the Nullification Crisis of 1832 and how did Andrew Jackson deal with it

Luba_88 [7]

In November, 1832, South Carolina took "the Ordinance of Nullification", declaring the tariffs null, void, and nonbinding in the state. U.S. Pres.

Because of that Andrew Jackson issued a proclamation that asserted the supremacy of the federal government.

8 0

3 years ago

Why does Washington warn Americans against "the spirit of parties"?

storchak [24]

He thinks the spirit of parties are the worst because, “It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.” A government with great power is prone to abuse it, a government needs to distribute the powers so no part of the government is strong enough to over power the other.

3 0

3 years ago