That's an interpretive question that would ask us to get inside the mind of Lincoln from a distance a century and a half away. We do know that Lincoln long had moral and political objections to slavery. He had outlined some of those thoughts in a speech given in Peoria, Illinois, in 1854. But Lincoln's views on what to do about slavery were something that took shape over time. In the Peoria speech, he suggested that perhaps slaves should be freed in order to be returned to Africa. But as the conflict over slavery grew and the Civil War became a reality, Lincoln became firmer in seeing this as a struggle not just over preserving the Union but also a battle for human dignity and the principle of equality. And so in the Gettysburg Address, in 1863, he affirmed the principle stated by the Declaration of Independence, that all men are created equal. The massive number of casualties at the Battle of Gettysburg certainly gave impetus to Lincoln's words about preserving the Union and government of the people, by the people and for the people. But those ideas had been central to Lincoln's worldview before Gettysburg as well as in that speech.
Answer:
the making of natural resources
machines increase the production of cloth
The answer is rice hope this helps
Answer: Wealthy civilizations conquered neighboring areas.
Explanation:
Land has always been a valuable resource and in the ancient world was a sign of how much power a nation possessed.
With the wealth accumulated by the wealthier civilizations, they were better able to not only raise armies but to equip them as well.
They would then use these armies to conquer neighbouring areas to increase their influence and area of control and to show how powerful they were.
Answer: They are monitoring the work of police officers.
Explanation:
The Black Panther Party (BPP) was a political party founded by several students. The party also monitored police officers because there were outbursts known as police brutality. In its program, the party also had social programs such as free meals for socially vulnerable categories. Some party members also took part in criminal activities and came on several occasions from exchanging fire with police officers. Due to such outbursts, a law was passed banning the carrying of loaded firearms. Some political officials have pointed out that the organization's existence poses a threat to internal security. The organization existed from 1966 to 1982