Answer: The answer is complex and not straightforward.
Explanation:
The article relates to Churchill and Roosevelt, so is probably dated from World War 2.
Given this and the reference to the use of force by aggressive nations it is reasonable to assume that this refers to the Axis nations and their allies, primarily Germany, Japan and Italy.
What is being referred to is reflected in the policies applied to Germany and Japan at the end of World War 2. (Italy had already switched sides and deposed Mussolini).
In the post war agreements drawn up, Germany and Japan were largely demilitarised with strict control over their armed forces. In the case of West Germany their limited armed forces existed only within the context of NATO to prevent any aggressive use as was evidenced at the beginning of World War 2.
In both instances these countries were not allowed to develop or possess nuclear weapons.
Until such time as there is a global disarmament treaty, as referred to in the article, then countries which are deemed "aggressive", the losers in a conflict, by others, the winners, have arms controls imposed.
Of course this does not and has not stopped the proliferation of weapons, and conflicts throughout the world since 1945, including the aggressive policies of countries such as the UK and the USA.
Most provinces in the middle-east and Spain and the balkans and the low countries region
Answer:
Explanation:
Some of the factors that contributed to Ngo Dinh Diem losing popularity in South Vietnam are:
1). He supported communism
2). He failed to call for land reform
3). He restricted the activities of Buddhists.
Ngo Dinh Diem who was born on January 3, 1901 was a Vietnamese political leaders who later became the president of the then South Vietnam in the year 1954 to 1963, He died on November 2, 1963 at the age of 62 years. He was assassinated by his generals during a coup d'etat.
Knowing absolutely nothing about any of these events- obviously, "C". Is the only event necessarily capable of unifying a country.
<span>Nothing can possibly unite a country like overthrowing and kicking out foreign rulers! </span>
<span>A- No appointed ruler can satisfy all factions. </span>
<span>B- As above, so below. </span>
<span>D- Beside the fact that one guy arming himself is not going to make everybody happy, that he had to do it secretly implies that he must not have had all the country behind him. </span>
Answer:
claiming that the boundary was the Nueces River to the northeast of the Rio Grande, considered the advance of Taylor's army an act of aggression
Explanation:
