1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ulleksa [173]
3 years ago
12

Assume the government significantly increases spending for infrastructure, and taxes and interest rates do not change as a resul

t of the spending. How will that change in government spending affect aggregate demand, short-run aggregate supply, the price level, and real GDP?
Social Studies
1 answer:
Hoochie [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Explanation: There is a high possibility that the rise in taxes will negate the impact of rising government spending which would leave Aggregate Demand (AD) unchanged. However, it is possible that increased spending and rise in tax could lead to an increase in GDP.

In a recession, consumers may reduce spending leading to an increase in private sector saving. Therefore a rise in taxes may not reduce spending as much as usual.

The increased government spending may create a multiplier effect. If the government spending causes the unemployed to gain jobs then they will have more income to spend leading to a further increase in aggregate demand. In these situations of spare capacity in the economy, the government spending may cause a bigger final increase in GDP than the initial injection.

However, if the economy is at full capacity, the increase in government spending would tend to crowd out the private sector leading to no net increase in Aggregate demand from switching from private sector spending to government sector spending.

You might be interested in
Scientific inquiry often begins with developing a hypothesis is this true or false
tatuchka [14]
Not hypothesis, observation
5 0
3 years ago
In what way did the reunification of Germany lead to the downfall of the Soviet Union?
Anuta_ua [19.1K]

Answer:

C. It inspired countries in Eastern Europe to engage in war to overthrow Soviet rule.

Explanation:

In November 1989. fall of the Berlin wall began, and the East and West parts of Berlin reunited again. The eastern part was under the strict Soviet rulership and propaganda, and the fall of the wall meant freedom of information and movement for its citizens, as well as the symbolic decline of SSSR’s power.

<u>Encouraged by the demolition of the wall and sense revolution, various Eastern countries started their own protests and fights for change.</u> Some of them were already active before the fall of the wall, but <u>the unification of Berlin gave everyone hope</u>. Hungary opened the borders, Poland had free elections, Prague rose Velvet Revolution against the communistic government, and Romanians overthrew dictator Ceausescu. The so-called Iron curtain of the Soviet rulership started to rise from Eastern Europe.

6 0
3 years ago
Which statement about new federalism is not true?
MatroZZZ [7]

Answer: The statement about New Federalism that is not true is the last one: "<u>President Reagan was able to promote new federalism consistently throughout his administration".</u>

Explanation: New Federalism was a plan launched by Robert Nixon during his presidency, which extended from 1969 until 1974, and continued by President Reagan. However, <u>Reagan's proposals</u> within this plan <u>were not as successful as Nixon's</u>. Moreover, <u>some of Reagan's proposals were not even implemented since they went against another programs or against the interests of particular groups</u>. In that way, it cannot be said that President Reagan was able to promote new federalism in a consistent way; therefore, the last statement provided is false.

3 0
3 years ago
having a(n) locus of control indicates that a person feels that they have a sense of personal control.
Advocard [28]

Having an internal locus of control indicates that a person feels that they have a sense of personal control.

<h3>What is an internal locus of control?</h3>

This is associated with the believe that one have a control over what happens.

However, If one believe that you have no control over what happens and that external variables are to blame, then you have what is known as an external locus of control.

Read more about locus of control

brainly.com/question/27995502

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
keisha puts herself down all the time. she is very negative about everything and doubts her ability to succeed. keisha is displa
vagabundo [1.1K]
The answer would be D) Low self-esteem.
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did soviet agriculture harm the aral sea?
    14·1 answer
  • Imon was confronted with a serious ethical dilemma. he responded with a solution that created the greatest good for the greatest
    14·1 answer
  • The outer or penukbral shadow is an area where earth block. of the
    12·1 answer
  • What kind of agriculture did some indigenous farmers pratice​
    12·2 answers
  • Pls help, im sturggling so harddd
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of changing physical capital?. .
    12·2 answers
  • What are the major shocks a juvenile faces upon release to the community?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of these events MOST impacted the way Americans viewed the Middle East region
    8·2 answers
  • Which statement about the influence of individuals and/or groups of people in history is false?
    7·1 answer
  • When an administrative rule has been properly promulgated under the administrative procedures act, what effect does it have?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!