Answer:
Anaphora should be answer for your question
Answer:
C. they describe the Cratchit home
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Secondary Source
Explanation:
The sentence above is an example of a "secondary source."
"Secondary source" is considered a<em> secondhand information.</em> This means that it is <u>not a direct evidenc</u>e about a particular situation. One example of this is describing an information about a primary source. By stating "In the book...," the speaker is acknowledging that the information he is going to state is<u> from the book</u><em> (the primary source).</em> So, this shows that the sentence is a secondary source.
Thus, this explains the answer.
Answer:
- Correct decision:
E). Mario should not use the source.
- Justification:
H). It has not been peer reviewed.
Explanation:
While conducting research, it is necessary to ensure the credibility of the sources as it may affect the worth or significance of the research. In order to ensure the reliability of the source, peer-reviewed sources are considered scholarly and authentic, as it contains information written or approved by a team of experts.
In the given situation, Mario should be suggested, not to use the source with a justification that it has not been peer-reviewed that implies, it has not been reviewed by the experts. This makes the source less reliable and hence should not be used for the research.