Answer:
Cash flow from operating activities = $1,000
Explanation:
Statement of Cash flow
<u>Cash from Operating activities</u>
Net Income $3,000
+ Depreciation $2,000
+ Loss from sales of PPE $1,000
<u><em>Adjustment on Working capital</em></u>
Increase in accounts receivables -$4,000
(1,000 - 5,000)
Decrease in Inventory $1,000
(5,000 - 4,000)
Decrease in Account payable -$1,000
(4,000 - 5,000)
Decrease in unearned revenue <u>-$1,000</u>
(1,000 - 2,000)
Cash flow from operating activities <u>$1,000</u>
Answer: The lifetime value of customers.
Explanation:
The banks are building a business relationship with the young high school students, based on the overall lifetime customer value they predict to obtain from each student. The life time customer value is the financial benefits a business gains from a customer, as a result of the relationship they share overtime.
Answer:
it is not allocatively efficient
Explanation:
Monopoly is a market condition where one seller has all the market share. This leads to an inefficient market structure, an increase in the prices of goods and services and abnormal profits. A problem with adopting a fair return polity for a natural monopoly is that it is not allocatively efficient. In a monopoly, goods and services are not produced to help the economy or people.
Answer:
Part 1
Absorption Costing Net Income = $760,700
Part 2
Income under absorption costing will be: Lower than income using variable costing
Explanation:
The difference in net income under absorption costing and variable costing is because of fixed costs that are in closing inventory.
If we are given net income under one method we can find the net income under the other method by performing a reconciliation as follows :
Reconciliation of Variable Costing Income to Absorption Costing Income
Variable Costing Net Income $767, 200
Add fixed cost in closing stock (4, 700 × $2.50) $11,750
Less fixed costs in opening stock (7, 300 × $2.50) ($18,250)
Absorption Costing Net Income $760,700
