The quantity theory of money predicts that the inflation rate will be 4% if the money supply increases by 6%, real GDP increases by 2%, and the velocity of money remains constant.
All the money and other liquid assets present in an economy on the measurement date are referred to as the money supply. The money supply roughly consists of deposits that can be utilized virtually as easily as cash in addition to actual currency.
Governments issue coin and paper money supply through a mix of national treasuries and central banks. By dictating to banks what reserves they must maintain, how to offer credit, and other financial issues, bank regulators have an impact on the amount of money that is available to the general people.
By regulating interest rates and altering the amount of money flowing through the economy, economists study the money supply and create policies based on it. Because the money supply may have an impact on price levels, inflation, and the business cycle, both the public and private sectors conduct analyses. The most significant determining factor in the money supply in the United States is Federal Reserve policy. The term "money stock" also applies to the money supply.
Learn more about money supply here
brainly.com/question/24249291
#SPJ4
Answer:
If we find out that technology has shifted the labor demand to the left, this is a disadvantage to labor.
Explanation:
To begin with, It's important to properly understand the concept of Marginal Product of Labour.
In simple terms, marginal product of labor is basically the change in unit output occasioned by a unit change in labor. There are a number of factors that may cause a marginal change in labor. Suffix to say, marginal change can either be to the right or to the left.
To narrow it down, we have technology to consider as one of the factors that ensue marginal change. Even more, this change can either be to the right or left. That is, an increase in technology might result to an increase in unit labour - this is to the right. And this is beneficial or advantageous to labor. In same vein, a increase in technology might result to a decrease in unit labour - this is to the left. And this is disadvantageous to labor.
It's on established record that introduction of new technologies, procedures and processes often have a direct effect on an individual employee. This altogether affects the marginal product in labour.
Hence, when technology brings changes to the left, this is a disadvantage to labour, as there is possibly a downsizing or reduction in labor strengths occasioned by the new technologies.
Hello! Sorry this is a little late.
I believe the correct answer to your question is $87.75.
I hope this helps, and have a great rest of your day!
Answer:
The correct answer is:
Expenditures—2017 in the amount of $200. (C.)
Explanation:
This scenario describes a record that was less than the actual amount spent on the General Fund supplies. The amount recorded was $2,000, meanwhile the actual amount spent was $2,000. This entails that an amount worth $200 was not recorded, hence it will be debited as expenditures, but the question now is where the debit will be recorded?
This review was done in January 2017, meaning that the income statement for the 2016 Fiscal year must have been balanced, hence the amount will be an expenditure recorded in 2017, but the particulars will have a description that it was a carried over expenditure from 2016. Therefore $200 will be debited from 2017 as expenditures.
