Answer:
Each new step in science reconciles twenty seemingly discordant facts as merely the various manifestations of a single principle.
Explanation:
Even though the only context we have is the sentence itself, we can safely choose number 2. This type of sentence is used when we wish to present contrasting ideas. There would be no reason, for example, for science to unify what is already harmonious, or to undermine what is already erroneous. Those ideas are redundant. It makes much more sense to say that science reconciles facts that are seemingly discordant. That is the wonder in science: to see different things as the manifestations of a single principle, which could seem, if science did not exist, impossible.
Spoken words give a look into how the characters acts. You can hear the feelings of multiple characters. Internal thoughts give you direct feelings of one character; the narrator:)
Now that you know the three types of rocks to look for, it’s time to grab the necessary tools: gloves, rock chisel, safety goggles.
I'm not positive, but I'd say the last one because humans have character traits so that's real life and a author can also make both real life and fictional characters have them?
Change
Alter
adjust
adapt
amend
revise
reshape
revamp
rework
remodel
refine