1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kogti [31]
3 years ago
5

The term laissez-faire refers to the government’s approach, in the 1890s, to

History
2 answers:
Bezzdna [24]3 years ago
5 0

Laissez Faire: A Conservative Approach to the Industrial Revolution. Laissez faire (from the French, meaning to leave alone or to allow to do) is an economic and political doctrine that holds that economies function most efficiently when unencumbered by government regulation.

Degger [83]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:  the government's approach to <u>economic policy affecting business</u>

Further detail:

The terminology of "laissez-faire" has been used in economics since the 18th century Enlightenment era.  "Laissez-faire" is French for "let do."  You can think of it as letting the economy do its own thing, without governments trying to interfere with it or control it.  This was an idea promoted by the Physiocrats in 18th century France.  They called themselves "Physiocrats" (those who believed in "rule by nature") because they thought trade and commerce should be allowed to proceed naturally.

The Scottish philosopher Adam Smith picked up on this idea also and promoted a capitalist economy in opposition to what he called a "mercantilist" economy where governments gave monopolies to certain merchants and tried to control business affairs.  

The 1890s approach in America meant a pro-business stance by the government, wanting to get government out of the way of businesses and free them of regulations.

You might be interested in
What obligations does pericles believe athenian citizens have to the state ?
Nostrana [21]
The primary obligation that Pericles believed Athenian citizens had to the state was to vote, since Athens was a "direct democracy" in which all eligible citizens could vote directly on legislation. 
4 0
3 years ago
Historical thinking skills can be divided into three main processes: asking questions, drawing conclusions and what?
Yanka [14]

Gathering information is another thinking skill. In history you can never jump to conclusions. You must first ask a question about something on the historical timeline. The next step is to research and gather information about the topic. At the end you can draw a final conclusion.

I hope this helps! :)

3 0
3 years ago
Which pharaoh was asked to release the Hebrews?
AnnZ [28]

Answer:

This is your answer to your question

Tutankhamen

5 0
2 years ago
When did western countries begin to embrace anime​
Alenkinab [10]

Answer:

The 80's and 90's

Pls Mark Brainiest, am trying to become Virtuoso

6 0
3 years ago
(NEED HELP) In this assignment, you will write a three- to four-paragraph Supreme Court opinion for
liberstina [14]

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.Joseph H. Gay, Jr., Assistant U.S. Attorney, Diane D. Kirstein, U .S. Attorney's Office, San Antonio, TX, Plaintiff–Appellee. Laura G. Greenberg, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Bradford W. Bogan, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Maureen Scott Franco, Federal Public Defender, M. Carolyn Fuentes, Federal Public Defender's Office, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant–Appellant.

In this case, we must decide whether the district court's imposition of a condition of supervised release prohibiting the defendant from “residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer” was plainly erroneous. We conclude it was not and AFFIRM.

I.

In January 1990, Michael Fields was convicted in Wisconsin state court of second degree sexual assault of a child.1 He was sentenced to five years in prison, but only served one year; the rest of his term was probated. Fields was required to register as a sex offender in Wisconsin for the rest of his life. Because of this conviction, he must also register as a sex offender in Texas. Fields has thrice been arrested and convicted for failing to register as a sex offender.2 He has also been repeatedly told by state authorities in both Wisconsin and Texas that he must register as a sex offender, instructions with which it appears he has never complied.3

Fields was arrested by the Austin Police Department for failing to register as a sex offender in April 2013. The next month, he was indicted in federal court and charged with one count of failing to register as a sex offender in violation of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”).4 After unsuccessfully moving to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that SORNA was unconstitutional, Fields pled guilty in July 2013.

In November 2013, Fields appeared before the district court for his sentencing hearing. At that hearing, the court reviewed Fields's criminal history record, and concluded that, even discounting several convictions where it was disputed as to whether Fields committed the crime, he had “a solid criminal record since 1974.” After hearing from counsel, the court then sentenced Fields to a 27–month sentence of imprisonment, followed by ten years of supervised release. The supervision included a number of conditions, including, as relevant here, a requirement that:

The defendant shall follow all other lifestyle restrictions or treatment requirements imposed by the therapist, and continue those restrictions as they pertain to avoiding risk situations throughout the course of supervision. This includes not residing or going to places where a minor or minors are known to frequent without prior approval of the probation officer.

Fields did not object to this condition. This timely appeal follows.

II.

We normally review conditions of supervised release for abuse of discretion.5 In this case, because Fields did not object to his supervised release condition while before the district court, we review for plain error.6 As the Supreme Court has made clear, plain error is a demanding standard:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The bill of rights addressed the powers of the national government because
    13·1 answer
  • After the kansas-nebraska act, what party did antislavery democrats form?
    9·1 answer
  • What was the Chinese and Soviet agreement called
    11·1 answer
  • What effect do you think the Homestead and Pullman strikes had on American culture and society in this time period?
    15·1 answer
  • What was the MOST immediate goal of the NAACP during the 1920s?
    11·2 answers
  • Do you think Jackson's approach to governing promoted democracy? Why or why not?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the major events that occurred during the Holocaust, and how did they impact targeted groups?
    15·2 answers
  • Compared to amending the U.S. Constitution, the process for amending the Texas Constitution is
    7·2 answers
  • Someone pls help quickly :(
    13·2 answers
  • I NEED ANSWERS ASAP!!!!
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!