Answer: to establish the layout of all slides, or a group of slides, in a presentation.
to determine the theme of all slides, or a group of slides, in a presentation.
to allow users to apply changes in layout or theme to an entire presentation.
Explanation:
It should be noted that the Slide Master refers to the top slide which controls the information regarding the background, fonts, theme, layout, and color of all the slides in Microsoft PowerPoint.
The phrase best describes the purpose of a slide master include:
• to establish the layout of all slides, or a group of slides, in a presentation.
• to determine the theme of all slides, or a group of slides, in a presentation.
• to allow users to apply changes in layout or theme to an entire presentation.
Therefore, the correct options are C, D and F.
Answer:
The formula for average is =AVERAGE(E15,E16).
The formula for highest is =MAX(F15,F16).
The formula for lowest is =MIN(G15,G16).
Explanation:
In MS Excel, on the left hand side below the tool bar there is a small box which tells the cell name where the cursor is clicked, the name of the cell can be changed from here easily, click on the desired cell and then by clicking on the box you can enter the name of the cell. After a cell is renamed the formula can be written by simply putting the name of the cell instead of the original e.g. E13
The formula for average is =AVERAGE(E15,E16).
The formula for highest is =MAX(F15,F16).
The formula for lowest is =MIN(G15,G16).
The cells provided in the formula above is just an example and more than two cells can be selected.
Answer:
The correct answer is telemarketing.
Explanation:
Telemarketing is a form of direct marketing in which an advisor uses the telephone or any other means of communication to contact potential customers and market products and services. Potential customers are identified and classified by various means such as their purchase history, previous surveys, participation in contests or job applications (for example, via the Internet). Names can also be purchased from another company's database or obtained from the phone book or other public or private list. The classification process serves to find those potential customers most likely to buy the products or services that the company in question offers.
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
