Answer and Explanation:
Respected Sir,
Sub: Absorption costing to analyze product costs and subsequent cost-volume-profit decisions
As per your requirement please find the explanation below:
Absorption costing is a process by which we add part of the fixed overhead to the production expense of the goods. If we do on a per-unit basis. Here we will compute by dividing the fixed costs by the number of units that we built and sold over the era. Whereas Variable costing includes fixed overhead as a lump sum instead of a per-unit price.
Under this process, all your variable costs like equipment, raw materials, and shipping are included. We will add the maximum fixed overhead costs for the duration. Such costs are not calculated on a per-unit basis. Rather than we deduct them as a lump-sum expense from your income amount.
Variable costing is really useful as it reveals the earnings after all the expenses are paid for the accounting period. While you would not have earned revenue for the goods we purchased as some may be in the inventory, we are showing you have paid all of your expenses for the time. We have excess revenue when you actually sell the finished goods in the warehouse.
The absorption approach is not all that effective as absorption costing will inflate the income figures excessively in any given span of accounting. Since you're not going to subtract any of your fixed costs as we did not sell any of us produced goods, our profit and loss report doesn't reflect the maximum expenses you've had for the time. Therefore, these results may mislead us when our profitability is analyzed.
Regards
ABC
It is possible but there should be some type of criteria that needs to be met. For example, the market should have room for both products and the other important thing to have in mind is that the company must have sufficient resources in order to produce both products simultaneously.
The reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
The principled type of negotiation is recognized as an interest-based class of negotiation.
- A principled negotiation is known as a winner-take-all style of negotiation that is focused on a specific goal of winning.
- In a principled type of negotiation, there are no space for consideration of other party’s needs and requirements.
- However, a principled negotiations is limited because it can fail to settle dispute or conflict even if a parties has the highest intentions and negotiating skills.
In conclusion, the reason principled negotiation would be the most suitable strategy in international trade negotiation is because it helps a party to leverage his/her principles of the opponent to win the negotiation.
Read more about principled negotiation
<em>brainly.com/question/6106694</em>
Answer:
Ruth, a cashier at a private bank, strongly believes that no matter how much effort she puts in or how many hours she works overtime, she will not be offered a promotion in the next 10 years. In this scenario, Ruth's beliefs are in accordance with the expectancy theory.
Answer:
a) 17.5%
Explanation:
The computation of the simple rate of return on the investment is shown below:
Simple rate of return = Annual net income ÷ Initial investment
where,
Annual net income is
= Sales revenue - cash operating expenses - depreciation expenses
= $250,000 - $100,000 - ($400,000 ÷ 5)
= $70,000
And, the initial investment is $400,000
So, the simple rate of return is
= $70,000 ÷ $400,000
= 17.5%
Dividing the annual net income by the initial investment we can get the simple rate of return
