It is always possible for the product of a rational number and irrational number to result in a rational value.
Answer:
1/3
Step-by-step explanation:
8/15*5/8=40/120=1/3
two angles are coterminal, namely land on the same spot on the circle.
let's check.
let's firstly divide 1965° by 360°, since 360° is a full circle, that way we know <u>how many full circles are</u> in 1965°.
1965 ÷ 360, gives us a quotient of 5 with some remainder.
5 * 360 = 1800, 5 full circles
if we subtract the full circles from 1965
1965 - 1800 = 165
low and behold, the remainder from that division is 165° ✔
in other words, 1965°, goes around the circle 5 times and then lands 165° after all that, in the same spot as 165°.
A null hypothesis illustrates that two variables in the hypothesis have no statistical significance.
The null hypothesis is: 
The regression equation is given as:
The variables are: 
and 
The null hypothesis states that, there is no statistical significance between and .
This is represented as:
Hence, the null hypothesis is:
Read more about null hypothesis at:
brainly.com/question/16261813
<span>$8.22h ≥ $623
Let's look at the options and see what works and what doesn't.
$8.22h > $623
* This inequality mostly works and it's true. But there may be a better choice later. So let's hold off on this one.
$8.22h ≤ $623
* That less than or equal has issues. Let's buy the bike if I have less money than what's needed? Nope, not gonna work. Although that equal portion does have an element of truth to it. But this is a bad choice.
$8.22h ≥ $623
* And this third option is better than the first. It simply says that you have to have enough or more money to buy the bike. The 1st equation basically said you have to have more money than the cost of the bike. So this is the correct choice.
$8.22h < $623
* This is worse than the 2nd option. In a nutshell, is says buy the bike when you don't have enough money. So bad choice.</span>
