Apartheid was a South African system of segregation by race.
Under this system many people of African decent faced discriminatory and oppressive political and economic practices.
The following is missing for the question to be complete:
A. Utilitarianism
B. Social responsibility
C. Consumerism
D. Preconventional morality
E. Distributive justice
Answer: A. Utilitarianism
Explanation: Utilitarianism is the doctrine according to which any procedure, rule, action, is good and useful if it suits the majority. According to this doctrine, the happiness and satisfaction of the majority should be the guide to which rules and norms should be harmonised. So, from the point of view of this doctrine, it is morally wrong to deprive most people of a popular student restaurant. It would be moral to meet the needs of the majority, to make the majority happy, and so the student restaurant would have usefulness, that is utility, hence the name of this doctrine. So the moral decision of what is good and what is wrong is made based on the outcome of the action or decision, and the outcome is good if it satisfies the majority.
C) Unionists supported secession as a last resort and only if it was done with the full support of all of the southern states, while Secessionists opposed secession altogether.
Answer:
In order for differential reinforcement to be most effective, the desirable behavior should be reinforced: immediately.
Explanation:
A reinforcement can encourage or discourage a certain behavior. For instance, if you are complimented by your parents when you get good grades, you may feel encouraged to get more good grades in the future. The compliments are a reinforcement. Differential reinforcement happens when only the desired or targeted behavior is reinforced. Other responses or behavior are not reinforced whatsoever. However, for differential reinforcement to work, it has to be done immediately, otherwise the association between reinforcement and behavior will not be so strong.
Answer:
U.S. Gun Policy: Global Comparisons
The United States is witnessing another year of record gun violence, raising domestic and international scrutiny of its comparatively loose gun laws and placing pressure on lawmakers to enact meaningful reforms.
Explanation:
- Gun ownership and gun homicide rates are high in the United States in comparison to rates in other advanced democracies.
- Mass shootings in Australia, Canada, and the United Kingdom prompted those governments to tighten gun laws.
