Answer:
Compound
Explanation:
You can split up this sentence into two sentences and it will still be grammatically correct.
<span>The prefix com- has the meanings “with”, “together”, “in association”, and “completely”.
<span>Hope this helps, and May the Force Be With You!
-Jabba</span></span>
Answer:
None of these.
Explanation:
A complete predicate is the part of a sentence that contains the verb and everything that is not the subject. This means that the phrase that starts from the verb to the very end, including the modifying phrases that complete the sentence, is the complete predicate.
A complete predicate is different from a predicate in that a predicate just includes the verb and the statement about the subject while a complete predicate will include everything from the verb to the modifying clause or phrase that follows it.
In the given sentence, the subject is "Lindsay" while the verb is "enjoys". So, the complete predicate will be "enjoys surfing but isn't very good", which is not given in the options.
So, the correct answer is "none of these".
Facts and explaining your topic with details
Explanation:
The first story, Rules of the Game by Amy Tan, has a first person point of view, but Tan also allows readers to view the daughter and mother at the same time. Just like other first person stories, the protagonist Waverly Jong is the narrator who tells us the story. As I read through the story, I am immersed into the story, which is one of the strengths of first person point of view. From the story,
It is very obvious. If the story was told using a different point of view, it will be changed drastically. For example, Waverly’s point of view represents the symbolism of “The art of invisible strength”, which means self control. If the story has a different point of view, the meaning of self control will become useless. And in the perspective of characterization, the point of view is also important. Since we see the story through Waverly’s eyes, we know what Waverly judges and thinks about the other characters, and what Waverly thinks about herself. She believes her accomplishment is based on her talent in chess, which leads to the climax rising action of Waverly running away. We see how Waverly was irritated by her mother, and again, if the story is not told by Waverly, we would not be able to understand that she did not mean to hurt her mother with the words of “Why do you have to use me to show off? If you want to show off, then why don’t you learn to play chess?” Or if the story is told in a third person point of view, like the old woman Waverly knocked into in the instance, we probably see a rude and unreasonable young girl who argues with her mother in the middle of a street.
