1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pantera1 [17]
3 years ago
13

Don’t lie what is the answer

History
1 answer:
Oliga [24]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

True

Explanation:

its that kind of democracy

You might be interested in
In the 1600s the British practiced economic imperialism in India through what British company?
IgorC [24]

Answer: C. The BEIC - British East India Company

6 0
3 years ago
What is the iran-contra scandal
grigory [225]

The Iran–Contra Scandal (Persian: ماجرای ایران-کنترا‎, Spanish: caso Irán-Contra), also referred to as Irangate,[1] Contragate[2] or the Iran–Contra affair, was a political scandal in the United States that occurred during the second term of the Reagan Administration. Senior administration officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was the subject of an arms embargo.[3] The administration hoped to use the proceeds of the arms sale to fund the Contras in Nicaragua. Under the Boland Amendment, further funding of the Contras by the government had been prohibited by Congress.


The official justification for the arms shipments was that they were part of an operation to free seven American hostages being held in Lebanon by Hezbollah, a paramilitary group with Iranian ties connected to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The plan was for Israel to ship weapons to Iran, for the United States to resupply Israel, and for Israel to pay the United States. The Iranian recipients promised to do everything in their power to achieve the release of the hostages.[4][5] However, as documented by a congressional investigation, the first Reagan-sponsored secret arms sales to Iran began in 1981 before any of the American hostages had been taken in Lebanon. This fact ruled out the "arms for hostages" explanation by which the Reagan administration sought to excuse its behavior.[6]

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was not a conclusion of the council of tent
Artyom0805 [142]

Answer:b

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
WHOEVER GETS THE ANSWER RIGHT GET BRAINILEST
grandymaker [24]

Answer:

(a) Items like tools and shelter were made so that they were easy to carry when the clans moved around.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP i am stuck!!
storchak [24]
Because "<span>The wealth of ancient Egyptian civilization truly derived from the blessed river that moves through the country with the dignity of a Caliph."</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The maurya dynasty lasted for
    6·2 answers
  • What is one major difference between the responsibility to pay taxes and the responsibility to vote?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain the processes used by the Ming Dynasty as they developed and expanded from 1450 to 1750
    10·1 answer
  • How were louis xiv and james ii similar and different
    11·1 answer
  • How did Radical Republicans differ from Moderate Republicans?
    6·2 answers
  • Ummm help please ...
    7·2 answers
  • George Washington was appointed as Commander of the Continental Army after which battle?
    13·1 answer
  • Ano ang heograpiya ng mesopotamia
    15·1 answer
  • What role did the British play in Tecumseh’s War?
    13·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me? :(
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!