Which is not a major factor leading to genocide?

2 answers:

8 0

The most appropriate answer to the question above is the equal distribution of the power towards the ethnic groups. The distribution of the power to the ethnic groups was not a major factor leading to genocide, instead demanding the people to prevent from having kids is the most major factor of genocide.

Tanya [424]2 years ago

6 0

NOT a major factor leading to genocide: distribution of power among ethnic groups.

[Based on answer choices I've seen with this question elsewhere.]

If that choice said "unequal distribution of power," that would be a different story. But the statement simply lists distribution of power among ethnic groups. That would imply that all ethnic groups have a share in power, which would help prevent one group being able to carry out genocide against another.

The contributing factors that do increase the likelihood of genocide:

economic, political, or social instability
unequal distributions of power and resources
leaders who increase tensions between groups (which would mean an unequal distribution of power among classes).

An example would be the genocide that occurred in Rwanda. The genocide in Rwanda had arisen out of problems created by colonialism in that country. The Dutch colonial government had favored the Tutsi people over the Hutus. (The factor of leaders increasing tension between groups.) That created unequal distribution of power and resources. When the Dutch pulled out of the country, the postcolonial situation was one of great economic, political and social instability. All of this played into the violence by Hutus against Tutsis when the Hutus came into power in Rwanda.

You might be interested in

The attack on pearl harbor destroyed the entire u.s. pacific fleet. true false

Tamiku [17]

The Anusere is true your wellcome

7 0

3 years ago

Aiden and Jayla recently learned that weathering (root wedging and ice wedging) breaks down rocks. They think that root wedging

KIM [24]

Answer:

1. Alessandra recently learned that erosion is the process of rocks breaking down as they move from one location to another. Alessandra decides to make observations of rocks on Monster Mountain. Alessandra takes photos of rocks at the top and at the bottom of Monster Mountain. Some of her photos are shown above. What effects of erosion do you see in Alessandra’s photographs?

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

Do you think Theodosius made the right decision in splitting the empire in two? Why or why not?

zmey [24]

Answer:

He made a terrible decision.

Explanation:

By splitting the empire in two, the Barbarians easily collapsed Rome, which lead to the death of the Roman Empire. It also led to the rise of the Byzantine Empire and the Frankish Empire. Over all, it was a terrible decision that changed European, perhaps even world history entirely.

4 0

2 years ago

In the late 140os and early 150os, what was a

KiRa [710]

In the late 1400s and 1500s, the main reason for exploration in the New World was the need for alternate trade routes. They have no idea the Americas even existed, however.

5 0

2 years ago

1. Why did the US adopt a more militaristic stance toward the Soviet Union?

Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

Explanation:

A Divided Europe

In response, the U.S. and its Western allies sought ways to prevent further expansion of Communist influence on the European continent. ... Events of the following year prompted American leaders to adopt a more militaristic stance toward the Soviets.

7 0

2 years ago