1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nezavi [6.7K]
3 years ago
8

In the poem, Dulce ET Decorum est, “ what form of warfare was used when the troops were protected significantly from small arms

and were sheltered?
A. airborne warfare

B. Guerilla warfare

C. Trench warfare

D.biological warfare
English
1 answer:
Natalka [10]3 years ago
8 0

In the poem, Dulce ET Decorum est, “ the form of warfare that  was used when the troops were protected significantly from small arms and were sheltered is known as the <u>Trench warfare</u>

Explanation:

In this poem the poet has talked about world war -I.In the first world war the warfare technique used was that of the Trench warfare.

In trench warfare long Trenches , narrow ditches are created by digging the ground and it was the place where the  soldiers lived. These trenches where very  muddy, uncomfortable and because of this many soldiers developed a  medical problems known as  trench foot.

Trench warfare was developed by the French military engineer Sébastien Le Prestre de Vauban .

These trenches offered shelter to the  soldiers  from the storm of fires that came from the rifle, machine gun of the enemy.

In the poem, Dulce ET Decorum est, “ the form of warfare that  was used when the troops were protected significantly from small arms and were sheltered is known as the <u>Trench warfare</u>

You might be interested in
Whats Wrong With a World Government?<br><br> I need an essay pronto.
White raven [17]

"Global democracy is obviously out of the question since the world’s people are incapable of collective deliberation, decision, or supervision of their supposed representatives." James Kalb, Crisis Magazine. In a one-world government, all nations would succumb under one governmental system, it would transcend national boundaries, all borders would be opened, and every nation would adopt either the same currency or the same language, or both. The advantages to this idea are seemingly endless, with the possibilities of almost all major wars being prevented, one currency being used, faster modernization, infrastructure, and relief of disasters, natural and man-made. There should be a major decrease in gang-related activities, slavery, child soldiers, drug economies, human trafficking, etc. Based on these potential benefits, one might come to the conclusion that a one-world government could work and is actually a good idea. Unfortunately, there are too many circumstances, variables, and risks involved regarding this proposal, which is why a world government will not work, well not under our current circumstances.

Hear me out.

As stated before, there are a plethora of pros to this concept, but it is unfortunate that the cons outweigh them. In this speech I want to address the disadvantages to this type of government, specifically what will guarantee it to fail: There are questions, such as will every nation be on board? Some countries like North Korea, Vietnam, or China might oppose a democratic government or even the concept of world governance. How the world will religions feel about this? Many Christians believe that the Bible speaks of there being a world-government established during the end-times, a revelation revealed in the book of Daniel. The possibility of a revolt or major pushback is high and will put a dent into these plans since 2.4 billion Christians currently occupy the world. The loss of one's identity is very important and will be in jeopardy if this is enacted. In the official definition, it is stated that global governance will "transcend all boundaries" meaning all borders will be opened. Like I said before, all currencies would either be the same or boiled down to a few, world languages would most likely be replaced with Mandarin (Chinese) or English, and our national and cultural identities would more than likely be stripped away; That last possibility might not sit well with many Americans and others who are heritages are based on values and traditions. The world will end up being a huge melting pot, where many people will flock to the largest cities due to the ease of access, possibly creating overpopulated areas in the most popular cities. They are also three huge questions that will need to be answered: 1. What if the government becomes corrupt? 2. What country or countries will be involved in the decision-making procedures, will it be all of them or a select few? And 3. What if a majority, even 1/5 of the countries are stubborn or do not want to participate in the process? Will they be excommunicated, cut off from supply and help, or will they be forced? The worst-case-scenario is the government being corrupted and World War III, one that will be fought because not everyone wants to join together. These reasons alone, are why the theory simply cannot work.

Conclusion

Ultimately, a world government could be possible if the leaders of the world really wanted to try it. The EU has been very successful in its combination of countries. Though they are made up of 28 out of 195 countries in the world, with many having their own system of operation. There a too many risks invovled and people who's own identities will be lost against their own will. There will be laws that over 100 million people will disagree with. Tensions, religious conflict and backlash, uprisings and a likelyhood of rebellions is possible. If there is a corrupt world nation, War World 3 almost inevitale, and the end of the world will be loming, it is safe to say, a world govenrment will not work.

6 0
2 years ago
Read the following line from the text:
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
Ahh Edgar Allen Poe.... I think that the sentence means the author is scared and even amazed by the shininess of the eye. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
An autobiography's primary purpose is to ______ but it is also considered _____.
Zina [86]

Answer:

(C) An autobiography's primary purpose is to entertain but it is also considered factual.  

This is because the story is about the author, and the author is the one writing the story. The author will try to entertain the readers about his life and story, but it is also factual because it is true.

6 0
2 years ago
As long as I have the permission of another person, I may use his or her work without recognizing the contribution.
Stella [2.4K]
The answer is false because if you do it is called plagerism
6 0
3 years ago
Please give me the correct answer ​
Zanzabum

Answer:

At first she was upset by the rush of visitors but now she feels more comfortable with it.

Explanation:

According to the given excerpt, the narrator feels inconvenienced by the influx of visitors at her family home but when her cousin from India gives her a special gift which she once had, she is immediately "transported" and becomes more comfortable with their presence.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why does atticus tell them to stop bothering boo radley?
    12·1 answer
  • “There is no lake at Camp Green
    8·1 answer
  • Making sure that the purpose of your writing is clear to your audience, that your main ideas are supported with details and exam
    15·1 answer
  • Explain how Sophocles uses the character of Teiresias to affect the play.
    11·2 answers
  • Please answer fast: Italian-born navigator who served both Spain and Portugal. Mapmakers of the New Word used his name for these
    14·1 answer
  • What's does it mean to levy a tax
    9·2 answers
  • Argumentative essay example
    7·1 answer
  • She won the election last year into when question​
    11·2 answers
  • What is the adverb in Put the vase up on the shelf
    12·2 answers
  • 1.A half step is the closest distance between two notes. True / False
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!