Answer:
5209.60 pesos
Step-by-step explanation:
$440 x 11.84= 5209.60
Answer:
Only C is a function
Step-by-step explanation:
To test whether a graph is a function you use the vertical line test.
If you can place a vertical line anywhere on the plane (in the domain of the "function" to be tested) and it intersects the curve at more than one point, the curve is not a function.
We see with A, wherever we put the vertical line it intersects twice.
With B, it intersects infinitely many times.
C is a function because wherever we put the vertical line, it only intersects once.
D is a function because it intersects twice providing we do not put it on the "tip" of the parabola.
The mathematical reasoning behind this is that a function must be well-defined, that is it must send every x-value to one specific y-value. There can be no confusion about where the function's input is going. If you look at graph B and I ask you what is f(3)? Is it 1? 2? 3? ... Who knows, it's not well-defined and so it's not a function. However if I ask you about C, whichever input value for x I give you, you can tell me to which y-value it gets mapped/sent to.
Answer: The difference is as follows:
Step-by-step explanation:
- Deductive Arguments: A deductive argument is an argument wherein it is felt that the premises give an assurance of reality of the end. In a deductive arguments, the premises are planned to offer help for the conclusion that is so strong to an extent that, if the premises are valid, it would be impossible for the conclusion to be false.
- Inductive Arguments: An inductive arguments is an arguments where it is believed that the premises provide reasons supporting the likely truth of the conclusion. In an inductive arguments, the premises are proposed distinctly to be strong to an extent that, on the off chance that they are valid, at that point it is impossible that the conclusion is false.
The contrast between the two originates from the kind of connection the author or explainer of the argument takes there to be between the premises and the conclusion. In the event that the author of the argument accepts that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion because of definition, l<igical entailment or scientific need, at that point the argument is deductive. In the event that the author of the argument does not feel that reality of the premises certainly sets up reality of the conclusion, however in any case accepts that their fact gives valid justification to accept the conclusion genuine, at that point the argument is inductive.
Answer:
k = 2
Step-by-step explanation:
-8k + 6 = -10k + 10
-8k = -10k +4
2k = +4
2k / 2 = 4 / 2
k = 2
