All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
The key focus of the article is a rat called HeroRAT that was used to sniff out buried explosives in Cambodia. So the article is about Rats and Land Mines.
<h3>What did HeroRAT do?</h3>
HeroRat, also known as Magawa, is the name given to an African giant rat in Cambodia (which was six years old as of 2020) that was able to save many lives by detecting thirty-nine landmines.
It also detected over twenty-seven items in Cambodia that hadn't exploded. The correct answer, thus, is D.
See the link below to learn more about Rats and Land Mines:
brainly.com/question/26368251
I’m 1960, women made $0.61 for every $1 that men made. So women were not being treated as equals in the work force, and their work was not considered as valuable.
In Mesopotamia, priests were equal to the king in power, they were basically the middle ground between God and human beings. They depended on the priests to help them be closer to their Gods, providing success in every area of life
