Answer:
U.S. Tax Burden on Cola:
The amount of the tax on a case of cola is $4 per case. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $1 per case, and the burden that falls on producers is ___$3______ per case.
The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers.
a. True
b. False
Explanation:
The tax burden on consumers, which is represented by the difference in the price of cola from $5 to $6 per unit is $1 ($6 - $5). However, the cash received by producers reduced by $3 from $5 to $2. This shows that the total tax burden on both consumers and producers is $4 ($1 + $3).
This represents a total tax burden of $4 or about 67% based on the new selling price of cola or 80% based on the old selling price of cola.
"The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on consumers alone. This because the price of cola would have increased to $9 per unit. Since the demand for cola in this instance is elastic, this change in price would have caused a more than 80% change in the quantity demanded.
Answer:
$214,000
Explanation:
The total reservation cost per month is given by the following expression:

Where 'n' is the number of monthly reservations.
If there are 200,000 reservations for passengers taking a trip next month, the reservation cost is:

Total reservation cost is $214,000.
Answer:
The answer is: A) Declare the law constitutional because Milton's actions substantially affect interstate commerce.
Explanation:
The Commerce Clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution of the United States:
[The Congress shall have Power] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes.
Congress can enact laws that regulate interstate commerce, and this law is an example of one of them. It doesn't matter if Milton's action only affect commerce in a very small way, the law is still constitutional.
Answer:
WACC 8.53600%
Explanation:
The Weighted average cost of capita lconsiders the weight of the equity times the cost of it.
And the wight of the dbet times the cost of financing after the tax shield.
Ke 0.11000
Equity weight 0.65
Kd 0.06
Debt Weight 0.35
t 0.34
WACC 8.53600%
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is given below:
a)
Direct labor rate variance = (Actual rate - Standard rate) × Actual hours
= ($22.50 - $23) × 8,450 hours
= -$4,225.00 Favorable
Direct labor time variance = (Actual hours - Standard hours) × Standard rate
= (8,450 hours - 8,400 hours) × $23
= $ 1,150.00 Unfavorable
Total direct labor cost variance is
= Direct labor rate variance + Direct labor time variance
= $4,225 Favorable + $1,150 Unfavorable
= -$3,075.00 Favorable
b. In the case when the employees are not much experienced or they are poorly trained so the less experience cause to less performance due to which the actual time needed should be more than the standard one