Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Will the court rule in support of Daniel’s argument that Nintendo breached the warranty based on reasonable expectation on the performance of an expensive system and statements made while selling the gaming system?
Rule: There is a creation of express warranty when a seller makes a description of the statement quality, condition or performance of goods sold. This warranty is created by the statement of facts and if the seller uses words to designate the value of the supposed goods, it will only be considered as an opinion that does not create any express warranty.
The customer’s reasonable expectation of the existence of the gaming system based on the price leads to implied warranty. The goods sold should be logically fit for the general purpose for which it is sold. It should be of proper quality to satisfy the implied warranty of merchantability and the goods should fit the particular purpose for which the buyer will use the goods to satisfy the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
Analysis: Here, the argument of Daniel that Nintendo’s description of the gaming system as “most reliable”, and “durable” asserted that the quality and performance of the gaming system will not stay because these words create general statements that are made as part of sale or seller’s opinion about the goods. These words would be considered as puffery and do not create any express warranty. The higher price of the gaming system would create an implied warranty about the performance of the system, but the switch failed only after the warranty period. When the seller has expressly stated the warranty period as one year, any defects that occur after the warranty period will not breach the implied warranty.
Moreover, the gaming system was reasonably fit for Daniel’s business purpose and worked well during the warranty period. Hence Daniel’s arguments will not stay in front of the court.
Conclusion: The court will not rule in favor of Daniel and Daniel will not be able to recover against Nintendo because no breach of warranty had occurred.
Answer: D. 2.2%
Explanation: Equity Dividend Rate is calculated by dividing the Before Tax Cash Flow by the Acquisition price. If you need the answer in percentage form, you then multiply by 100.
Here, before-tax cash flow = $11,440
Acquisition price = $520,000
So Equity Dividend Rate = 
X 100
Equity Dividend Rate = 2.2%
In this question, you do not need the Net Operating Income (NOI). You only need the NOI if the Before Tax Cash Flow is not given and the debt service payment is. If this is the case, you subtract the debt service payment from the NOI to get the Before Tax Cash Flow.
Answer:
The correct answer is “Pricing below competitors”.
Explanation:
It is given that the organization is operating with a lower cost structure as compared to its competitor and it is also enjoying the economies of scale. Since lower cost structure makes the organization capable to keep the price of its product lower as compared to its competitor. Moreover, the lower price of a commodity will attract new customers. Consequently, its sales volume will increase.
Answer:
The correct answer to the following question is option B) $2500 .
Explanation:
Given information -
Proceeds to be received on life insurance - $150,000
Carin receives 10 installments of $17,500 each , which takes total amount to - $175,000
Premiums paid by Carins husband - $60,000
Carin collected - $17,500 from insurance company
The interest element that would be included in her gross income -
$175,000 - $150,000
= $25,000
She is receiving payments in form of annuity, and the amount that should be included in her gross income in the first year should -
$25,000 / $175,000 x $17,500
= $2500
Answer:
A) in any particular year, the level of GDP is determined mainly by the level of aggregate expenditure.
Explanation:
The formula for calculating the aggregate expenditure (AE) of an economy is the same used to calculate the gross domestic product:
Aggregate expenditures = consumption + investment + government + net exports (exports - imports)
The main difference between the GDP ans AE is that AE measures the planned consumption, the planned investment, the planned government expenses and the planned net exports.
he equation is: AE = C + I + G + NX. The aggregate expenditure determines the total amount that firms and households plan to spend on goods and services at each level of income.
