35% or 3.5 part per thousand
You must give credit to the source of your information on a written document or an oral presentation, to do otherwise would be to commit fraud. The offense is titled plagirism. It means you have taken anothers property (their knowledge) and presented it as your own rather than giving them credit for the information. Simply re-phrasing an idea may or may not be enough to rise above the offense but its best to stay on the up and up.
During an emergency, The nurse should option d: Check with the physician for his complete order.
<h3>Why Check with the physician for his
complete order?</h3>
The nurse is the person who need to first check with the physician for the full order of calcium due to the fact that the medication of calcium chloride is one that tend to have a good concentration of 13.6 mEq (3.4 mmol/l) of calcium per gram as well as calcium gluconate has 4.65 mEq (1.2 mmol/l) of calcium per gram.
The nurse can still tell the doctor the type of calcium that are available after the conversion in the rate of calcium that has been made;
Therefore, During an emergency, The nurse should option d: Check with the physician for his complete order.
Learn more about hypocalcemia from
brainly.com/question/4337966
#SPJ1
During an emergency, a physician has asked for I.V. calcium to treat a client with hypocalcemia. The nurse should:
a. Hand the physician calcium gluconate for I.V. use.
b. Hand the physician calcium chloride for I.V. use.
c. Hand the physician the kind of calcium available on the unit.
d. Check with the physician for his complete order.
Answer: avoider
Explanation:
This is a type of person who despises confronting situations or issues they would rather they sit down properly and deal with the issue in a more calmer way .
We all hate confrontation however it is necessary sometimes in order to tackle the issue and get it done with other wise we may find ourselves delaying issues or banking them which on its own is also not healthy.
Michael wants to work with what he already knows so that he can avoid the conflict that may arise from discussing what is not known.
Answer:
65% of participants delivered the full Ange of shocks, going up to 450 volts
Explanation:
Milgram's experiment has been denounced repeatedly by ethicists, commentators, and fellow psychologists. At the same time, the results surprised many experts within the field by showing what ordinary people are capable of doing to one another. The result that was likely the most surprising is that 65% of participants delivered the full Ange of shocks, going up to 450 volts.
