I really need help with #2

The owner of a skate shop notices that every time a certain employee has a shift, there are higher sales numbers at the end of t

Serjik [45]

Answer:

Correlation.

Step-by-step explanation:

When relationship between two or more variables are to be established such that the measure of the effect of one variable (independent variable) on the other variable (dependent variable) is evaluated , this is called correlation study or analysis. In the scenario above, the relationship between productivity or revenue and employee shift is correlated, that is a relationship was established between the revenue made and the shift days of a particular employee, which yielded a positive association between the two variables. The employee shift is the independent variable and the revenue made is the dependent variable.

6 0

3 years ago

In the figure, a∥e , m∥n , and m∠3 = 112°.

liq [111]

<1 = <2
vertical angles (congruent)

<3 = <2
corresponding angles (congruent)

so that: <1 = <2 = <3 = 112 degree

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The price decreased by nine dollars

suter [353]

Answer: -9

Step-by-step explanation: it is a negative because it is minus 9$ from the price just like adding -9

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Nick and Adam workout together. Nick weighs 160 pounds and is gaining about 3 pounds per week. Adam weighs 195 pounds and is los

kobusy [5.1K]

Answer: 160+(W x 3)=195-(W x 2)

Step-by-step explanation:

I'm not 100% sure this is right but it should be!

6 0

2 years ago

Letang Industrial Systems Company (LISC) is trying to decide between two different conveyor belt systems. System A costs $280,00

Vanyuwa [196]

We have to calculate the EAC for both the conveyor belt system.

Solutions :

Equivalent Annual Cost or (EAC) for the SYSTEM-A

$\text{Operating cash flow } = \text{Pre-tax annual operating cost (1-tax rate )} + (\text{depreciation expense} \times$ tax rate )

$=-855,000(1-0.23)+\left[\left(\frac{280,000}{4}\right)\times 0.23\right]$

$= (-85,000 \times 0.77 ) + (70,000 \times 0.23)$

= $ 49,350

Year Annual Cost flow Present value factor Present Value of Annual

at 10% cash flow

1 -49,350 0.909091 -44,863.64

2 -49,350 0.826446 -40,785.12

3 -49,350 0.751315 -37,077.39

4 -49,350 0.683013 -33,706.71

Total $ 3.169865 $ -156,432.86

Therefore, Net Present value = present value of the annual cash flow - initial investment.

= 156,432.86 - 280,000

= $ 436,432.86 (negative)

Now the EAC or the Equivalent Annual Cost for System A :

$\text{EAC}= \text{Net present value / (PVIFA 10 percent, 4 years)}$

$=\frac{436,432.86}{3.169865}$

$= 137,681.86$ dollar (negative)

$\text{Operating cash flow } = \text{Pre-tax annual operating cost (1-tax rate )} + (\text{depreciation expense} \times$ tax rate)

$=79,000(1-0.23)+\left[\left(\frac{360,000}{6}\right) \times 0.23\right]$

$=(-78,000 \times 0.77)+(60,000 \times 0.23)$

= -$ 47,030

Year Annual Cost flow Present value factor Present Value of Annual

at 10% cash flow

1 -47,030 0.909091 -42,754.55

2 -47,030 0.826446 -38,867.77

3 -47,030 0.751315 -35,334.34

4 -47,030 0.683013 -32,122.12

5 -47,030 0.620921 -29,201.93

6 -47,030 0.564474 -26,547.21

Total $ 4.355261 $ -204,827.91

Net Present Value = Present Value of annual cash inflows – Initial Investment

$= 204,827.91 - 360,000$

= -$ 564,827.91 (negative)

EAC for system B:

Equivalent Annual Cost for system B $=\frac{\text{net present value}}{\text{PVIFA 10 \text percent, 6 years}}$

$=\frac{-564,827.91}{4.355261}$

= -$129,688.66 (negative)

7 0

2 years ago