Answer:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
a. The fewer risk factors the better, so their unborn child is likely to be better off even with the limited help the social worker provided.
b. Their unborn child is not likely to be benefited by eliminating only one risk factor.
c. The unborn child might have been benefited if prenatal care were found, but improving prenatal nutrition is not important.
d. The health care and stress factors will only be important after the child is born.
In this example, the social worker is not able to help Robert and Nadine with all their problems. The couple still needs to find work and prenatal care. However, the social worker was able to help them find enough food to eat. Although the baby still faces some risks, the fewer risks, the better. Therefore, he is still better off than he was before thanks to the limited help of the social worker.
Answer: Freeborn women in ancient Rome were citizens, but could not vote or hold political office. I hope that answered your question.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Hans Selye is regarded as the founder of the theory of stress.
He developed the general adaptation syndrome (GAS) which describes how the body reacts to stress.
The stages of GAS are :
alarm reaction - flight or fight response to stress
resistance - continued exposure to stress leads to higher metabolic response to offset the stress
exhaustion - continued exposure to stress can negatively affect the body and lead to health problems
Hans made this discovery in the 1930s after studying the response of rats after the injection of hormones into them. He compared their cortisol and blood sugar levels in rats before and during the experiment.
He concluded that it was the stress that caused the rat to become ill and die
We can’t see the questions lol
Answer:Students do not learn to work with people of differing abilities.
Explanation:
researchers found that tracking caused a decrease in student achievement for low-track students and increased achievement for students placed in the higher track.
