1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
pav-90 [236]
3 years ago
14

Snakes hunt and kill small rodents as a food source what is it in example of

Social Studies
1 answer:
rodikova [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

predation

Explanation:

I did it on study island

You might be interested in
What strategy do egalitarian societies use to keep one individual from dominating others?
Lelechka [254]
The correct answer is ridicule.
4 0
2 years ago
what recommendations and conclusions can you make on the issue of human rights violations to the commities​
jeka57 [31]
Na hola shu la mu da te
3 0
2 years ago
Approximately ________ percent of senate incumbents win reelection
lions [1.4K]
<span>Historically incumbents who run for re-election are re-elected 78% of the time. Incumbents are known to their constituents and have a track record that can be reviewed, giving the voters some confidence in their choice.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not one of the four concerns listed in your text to describe possible reasons for the higher prevalenc
vlada-n [284]

Answer:

Women are more likely to be declined for services by insurance companies and third-party payers.

Explanation:

Normally women have been described as having a higher prevalence of psychological disorders and this has been attributed to several factors. One of the factors being that because of their multiple roles, they can undergo more stress. Also women are more likely to undergo stress for poverty and for the violence against them. However, it is unlikely for women to be declined for services by insurance companies and third-party payers.

5 0
3 years ago
Translate the following argument into symbolic form. Then determine whether it is valid or invalid by constructing a truth table
marissa [1.9K]

Answer:

R→ M

W→M

Therefore

R→W

See truth table in the attachment

Arguement is valid as it is always true as a whole.

Explanation:

logical statement

(R→M) ^ (W→M) → (R→W)

Based on the results in truth table, as the argument always holds true it is a valid arguement

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A woman is 15 weeks pregnant with her first baby. She asks how long it will be before she feels the baby move. The best answer i
    11·2 answers
  • According to the information presented in the text, which of the following statements is TRUE? A. Exposure to environmental time
    14·2 answers
  • In soccer the penalty spot is how many yards from the goal
    10·2 answers
  • 4. Consider the following example, is it an example of limited or unlimited government? Why?​
    6·1 answer
  • How many years did each of these dynasties last
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you think observation of the Sabbath is an important Jewish teaching?
    13·1 answer
  • despite its risks, the author clearly state " this route was favored by gold seekers from the eastern states." why do you think
    15·1 answer
  • I'm tall when i'm young and i'm short when i'm old. What am I?<br>​
    5·2 answers
  • Which region of georgia is located in the far northwest corner of the state and had a history of coal mining?
    13·1 answer
  • Perception management, which often is thought of as media manipulation, is primarily seen in use by the military in information
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!