Multiculturalism is the process through which new immigrants and their children enculturate into the dominant national culture, yet still retain a distinct ethnic culture of their own.
Multiculturalism in sociology refers to the way a society addresses cultural diversity. It expresses the idea that society is improved by preserving, appreciating and even promoting cultural diversity. It is based on the underlying premise that people from frequently quite different cultures may coexist peacefully. Multiculturalism is a term used in political philosophy to describe how civilizations decide to create and carry out formal laws addressing the fair treatment of other cultures. Either the ‘melting pot’ hypothesis or the ‘salad bowl’ theory describes how multiculturalism normally emerges.
To read more about melting pot hypothesis see:
brainly.com/question/1627368
#SPJ4
In 1763 the British Parliament passed a law saying the colonists couldn't go past the Appalachian Mountains which is one thing I know, but I'm not sure of the others.
Answer:
C. Low voter turnout at elections will eventually lead to the country becoming an oligarchy.
Explanation:
A is not the answer because many citizens are not interested in a vote though it is mandatory.
B is not the answer because citizens are not the policymaker.
C is the answer because if citizens don't use their rights, the governor misused their power.
D is not the answer because the only vote is not patriotism. Patriotism is a sense of feelings about their county.
I believe the answer is: Core
A nations is considered as a core of world's economic system if every economic decisions that made by that country would most likely set up the economic trend for the rest of the world. Other example of nations that considered as a 'core' are: England, China, Russia, and Germany
<span> Pizarro seized the Inca emperor,Atahualpa,massacred the senior Inca nobility,extracted a huge ransom in gold and silver for Atahualpa,then murdered him.Pizarro then went on to conquer an effectively leaderless Inca empire.
Much the same with Cortes and the Aztecs - initially pretending to be friendly,Cortes seized the Aztec emperor,extracted a huge ransom for him before murdering him and,although forced to retreat shortly after by superior numbers,soon returned with Mexican native allies to destroy the Aztec empire and conquer it for Spain.
Cortes' conquest was much harder fought than that of Pizarro,but basically their interaction with the natives was the same - kidnap th leader,extort a ransom,kill the hostage anyway,then attack and conquer their people.</span>
