_____hi_____bird shoe_____what your name_____jack______oo ok jack_____are u white_____ya_____o :/ forgot they exis_____o____bye_____ me being black:halla____
Advantage---Loose constructionists tend to uphold civil rights and liberties. Judicially active, loose constructionist judges such as Ruth Bader Ginsburg tend to dissent in cases which infringe civil liberties such as Salinas v Texas (2013) and agree with rulings that don't e.g. 2015 Same sex rulingAdvantage---Loose constructionists often protect minorities, especially those incompatible with Congress or the executive. This is because loose constructionists are not scared to overturn laws or actions made by Congress or the executive e.g. Brown v Board of EducationDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be judicially active, which has fuelled arguments on the politicisation of the Court. They 'legislate from the bench' by striking down laws as unconstitutional. This is undemocratic and elitist, as they have mandate from the electorateDisadvantage---Loose constructionists tend to be too sensitive to public opinion, which could hamper the neutrality and independence of the Court. However, some public support is necessary to maintain the authority of the Court.
Answer:
A. judicial I believe this is the answer
Article 1 section 8 of the constitution states that the congress has the power to support and raise armies as well as to provide and maintain a navy. Since having an airforce is a part of the idea of raising an army, and because the navy also has aircraft among its vehicles and trained pilots as troops, their establishment of an airforce is not unconstitutional.
